On 10/21/21 13:44, Matthew Auld wrote:
In theory if clflush_work_create() somehow fails here, and we don't yet
have mm.pages populated then we end up resetting cache_dirty, which is
likely wrong, since that will potentially skip the flush-on-acquire, if
it was needed.
It looks like intel_user_framebuffer_dirty() can arrive here before the
pages are populated.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_clflush.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_clflush.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_clflush.c
index f0435c6feb68..d09365b5eb29 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_clflush.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_clflush.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static void __do_clflush(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj));
drm_clflush_sg(obj->mm.pages);
+ obj->cache_dirty = false;
I think the guidelines are to avoid updating state in async work if at
all possible, so we need to add this after __do_clflush() in the sync
path and after dma_fence_work_commit() in the async path.
Will that work?
/Thomas
