On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 01:28:10PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2021, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 01:05:20PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Mon, 18 Oct 2021, Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Commit message goes here.
> >>
> >> > Fixes: f87c46c43175 ("drm/i915/dsi/xelpd: Add WA to program LP to HS wakeup guardband")
> >> > Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 2 +-
> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 ++-
> >> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
> >> > index 9ee62707ec72..8c166f92f8bd 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c
> >> > @@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ static void adlp_set_lp_hs_wakeup_gb(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> >> > if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) == 13) {
> >> > for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports)
> >> > intel_de_rmw(i915, TGL_DSI_CHKN_REG(port),
> >> > - TGL_DSI_CHKN_LSHS_GB, 0x4);
> >> > + TGL_DSI_CHKN_LSHS_GB_MASK, TGL_DSI_CHKN_LSHS_GB_MASK);
> >>
> >> I think you mean the value should be TGL_DSI_CHKN_LSHS_GB.
> >
> > IMO the value should never be named that. It should be
> > TGL_DSI_CHKN_LSHS_GB_<something>.
>
> Alternatively,
>
> #define TGL_DSI_CHKN_LSHS_GB(byte_clocks) REG_FIELD_PREP(TGL_DSI_CHKN_LSHS_GB_MASK, (byte_clocks))
>
> and
>
> intel_de_rmw(i915, TGL_DSI_CHKN_REG(port),
> TGL_DSI_CHKN_LSHS_GB_MASK, TGL_DSI_CHKN_LSHS_GB(4));
>
> ?
>
> We're using the value in a specific place that references a w/a, so the
> magic 4 isn't too bad.
Yeah, for parametrized defines I think the "_<something>" is
not needed. Probably not even desired. The argument passed in
is the "_<something>" essentially.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
