On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:43:31AM +0000, luo penghao wrote:
> Variable is not used in functions, and its assignment is redundant too.
> So it should be deleted.
>
> The clang_analyzer complains as follows:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c:1653:2 warning:
> Value stored to 'bestm1' is never read.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c:1651:2 warning:
> Value stored to 'bestn' is never read.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: luo penghao <luo.penghao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> index b84ed4a..28b1616 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> @@ -1644,13 +1644,11 @@ static void chv_prepare_pll(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> enum dpio_channel port = vlv_pipe_to_channel(pipe);
> u32 loopfilter, tribuf_calcntr;
> - u32 bestn, bestm1, bestm2, bestp1, bestp2, bestm2_frac;
> + u32 bestm2, bestp1, bestp2, bestm2_frac;
> u32 dpio_val;
> int vco;
>
> - bestn = crtc_state->dpll.n;
This one we could use. For some reason we hardcode it to
1 now, which is correct for our use cases but I don't really
see a reason to hardcode it here. We are supposed to calculate
it correctly after all, and chv_crtc_clock_get() also just blindly
reads it out.
> bestm2_frac = crtc_state->dpll.m2 & 0x3fffff;
> - bestm1 = crtc_state->dpll.m1;
This one is a bit trickier since I don't think the spec even
gives us other values. But we could assert that it's correct.
Some something along these lines I think would be best:
+ drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, bestm1 != 2);
vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_PLL_DW1(port),
DPIO_CHV_M1_DIV_BY_2 |
- 1 << DPIO_CHV_N_DIV_SHIFT);
+ bestn << DPIO_CHV_N_DIV_SHIFT);
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
