On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 5:17 PM Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Let's add lpt_pch_disable() as the counterpart to > lpt_pch_enable(). > > Note that unlike the ilk+ code the fdi_link_train() > and fdi_disable() calls are still left directly in > intel_crt.c. If we wanted to move those we'd need to > add lpt_pch_pre_enable(). But the two fdi direct fdi > calls are pretry symmetric so it doesn't seem too bad > to just keep them as is. > > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> apart from krobot suggestions. Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
