On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:43:17 -0700, <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The gem_exec_fair test is specifically testing scheduler algorithm
> performance. However, GuC does not implement the same algorithm as
> execlist mode and this test is not applicable. So, until sw arch
> approves a new algorithm and it is implemented in GuC, stop running
> the test.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
> index ef5a450f6..ca9c73c6e 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
> @@ -1314,6 +1314,12 @@ igt_main
> igt_require(gem_scheduler_enabled(i915));
> igt_require(gem_scheduler_has_ctx_priority(i915));
>
> + /*
> + * These tests are for a specific scheduling model which is
> + * not currently implemented by GuC. So skip on GuC platforms.
> + */
> + igt_require(intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(i915)) < 12);
Probably a feature check rather than a version check is better? Can we use
say gem_has_guc_submission() instead?
Though appears gem_has_guc_submission() only checks if guc submission is
available, not if it is actually in use (unless guc will used when
available automatically)? Is it possible to add the check if guc submission
is actually in use? Or a check for guc scheduler?
> +
> cfg = intel_ctx_cfg_all_physical(i915);
>
> igt_info("CS timestamp frequency: %d\n",
> --
> 2.25.1
>
