good question. I'm going to check that. Please accept this add "reserved" ids patch for now. I send more patches above this with market names if I find out the correct association. On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 05:56:29PM -0300, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> When publishing first HSW ids we weren't allowed to use "GT3" codname. >> But this is the correct codname and Mesa is using it already. >> So to avoid people getting confused why in Mesa it is called GT3 and here >> it is called GT2_PLUS let's fix this name in a standard and correct way. > > Do we know if there is a distinct mapping between PCI ID and marketing > names (4600, 5000, 5100, 5200 etc)? That would be useful to add as well. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- Rodrigo Vivi Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
