On Fri, 10 May 2013 20:58:17 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:10:27AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:29:28 +0200 > > Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 10:45:15AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > Works pretty well actually. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> > > > > > > Patches 1-3 merged to dinq, thanks. I'm a bit unhappy that we don't have > > > mipi yet, otoh mipi needs sink drivers so meh. > > > > Yeah, MIPI DSI is a bit messy regardless, so I think it's ok to call it > > "ready" even if we don't have some specific DSI panels supported. > > Another thing which looked _really_ fishy was non-eDP DP support on vlv. > Atm we often only take the new vlv dp paths due to is_cpu_edp being true > on vlv edp, too. Imo that should be remedied and we should move all the > vlv paths out of the is_cpu_edp checks (and maybe inline the port == > PORT_A check for ilk-ivb in all relevant places). Imre has ideas already, > too. Ok just be careful, because regular DP works fine here in testing. :) -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
