On 05/08/2013 09:53 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Bay Trail is the marketing name for the new Silvermont based SOCs we've > been calling Valleyview. All recent Intel disclosed documents use the > term "Bay Trail." AFAICT, only leaked docs (and our code) use the term > Valleyview. I've also verified with internal sources that references to, > "Valleyview" should be dropped. > > Why? > We've always strived to make the already confusing generation > information as clear as possible in our driver. With the introduction > of the below, we made two names referring to the exact same silicon. > > commit 93c34e70ebf464a9ee142d93b681c5df094ec654 > Author: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org> > Date: Mon Apr 22 00:53:50 2013 -0700 > > drm/i915: Fix page table entries for Bay Trail. > > While it's tempting to simply do the renames in Ken's patch, it's simply > not correct. As an added bonus, Mesa also uses the byt/baytrail names. > > Yes. I know this is painful. Doing it now is the least painful way to do > this right (short of going back in time.) > > disclaimer: only compile tested. > disclaimer2: I didn't fix pre-existing checkpatch issues. > > CC: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org> > CC: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
