On 8/20/2021 15:44, Matthew Brost wrote:
The GuC must receive requests in the order submitted for contexts in a
parent-child relationship to function correctly. To ensure this, insert
a submit fence between the current request and last request submitted
for requests / contexts in a parent child relationship. This is
conceptually similar to a single timeline.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h | 5 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h | 7 +
.../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 5 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 120 ++++++++++++++----
4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
index c2985822ab74..9dcc1b14697b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h
@@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ intel_context_to_parent(struct intel_context *ce)
}
}
+static inline bool intel_context_is_parallel(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+ return intel_context_is_child(ce) || intel_context_is_parent(ce);
+}
+
void intel_context_bind_parent_child(struct intel_context *parent,
struct intel_context *child);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
index 6f567ebeb039..a63329520c35 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
@@ -246,6 +246,13 @@ struct intel_context {
* work queue descriptor
*/
u8 parent_page;
+
+ /**
+ * @last_rq: last request submitted on a parallel context, used
+ * to insert submit fences between request in the parallel
request -> requests
With that fixed:
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
+ * context.
+ */
+ struct i915_request *last_rq;
};
#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index b107ad095248..f0b60fecf253 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -672,8 +672,7 @@ static int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
static bool is_multi_lrc_rq(struct i915_request *rq)
{
- return intel_context_is_child(rq->context) ||
- intel_context_is_parent(rq->context);
+ return intel_context_is_parallel(rq->context);
}
static bool can_merge_rq(struct i915_request *rq,
@@ -2843,6 +2842,8 @@ static void guc_parent_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_context_is_parent(ce));
GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_engine_is_virtual(ce->engine));
+ if (ce->last_rq)
+ i915_request_put(ce->last_rq);
unpin_guc_id(guc, ce);
lrc_unpin(ce);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index ce446716d092..2e51c8999088 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -1546,36 +1546,62 @@ i915_request_await_object(struct i915_request *to,
return ret;
}
+static inline bool is_parallel_rq(struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+ return intel_context_is_parallel(rq->context);
+}
+
+static inline struct intel_context *request_to_parent(struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+ return intel_context_to_parent(rq->context);
+}
+
static struct i915_request *
-__i915_request_add_to_timeline(struct i915_request *rq)
+__i915_request_ensure_parallel_ordering(struct i915_request *rq,
+ struct intel_timeline *timeline)
{
- struct intel_timeline *timeline = i915_request_timeline(rq);
struct i915_request *prev;
- /*
- * Dependency tracking and request ordering along the timeline
- * is special cased so that we can eliminate redundant ordering
- * operations while building the request (we know that the timeline
- * itself is ordered, and here we guarantee it).
- *
- * As we know we will need to emit tracking along the timeline,
- * we embed the hooks into our request struct -- at the cost of
- * having to have specialised no-allocation interfaces (which will
- * be beneficial elsewhere).
- *
- * A second benefit to open-coding i915_request_await_request is
- * that we can apply a slight variant of the rules specialised
- * for timelines that jump between engines (such as virtual engines).
- * If we consider the case of virtual engine, we must emit a dma-fence
- * to prevent scheduling of the second request until the first is
- * complete (to maximise our greedy late load balancing) and this
- * precludes optimising to use semaphores serialisation of a single
- * timeline across engines.
- */
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!is_parallel_rq(rq));
+
+ prev = request_to_parent(rq)->last_rq;
+ if (prev) {
+ if (!__i915_request_is_complete(prev)) {
+ i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(&rq->submit,
+ &prev->submit,
+ &rq->submitq);
+
+ if (rq->engine->sched_engine->schedule)
+ __i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&rq->sched,
+ &prev->sched,
+ &rq->dep,
+ 0);
+ }
+ i915_request_put(prev);
+ }
+
+ request_to_parent(rq)->last_rq = i915_request_get(rq);
+
+ return to_request(__i915_active_fence_set(&timeline->last_request,
+ &rq->fence));
+}
+
+static struct i915_request *
+__i915_request_ensure_ordering(struct i915_request *rq,
+ struct intel_timeline *timeline)
+{
+ struct i915_request *prev;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(is_parallel_rq(rq));
+
prev = to_request(__i915_active_fence_set(&timeline->last_request,
&rq->fence));
+
if (prev && !__i915_request_is_complete(prev)) {
bool uses_guc = intel_engine_uses_guc(rq->engine);
+ bool pow2 = is_power_of_2(READ_ONCE(prev->engine)->mask |
+ rq->engine->mask);
+ bool same_context = prev->context == rq->context;
/*
* The requests are supposed to be kept in order. However,
@@ -1583,13 +1609,11 @@ __i915_request_add_to_timeline(struct i915_request *rq)
* is used as a barrier for external modification to this
* context.
*/
- GEM_BUG_ON(prev->context == rq->context &&
+ GEM_BUG_ON(same_context &&
i915_seqno_passed(prev->fence.seqno,
rq->fence.seqno));
- if ((!uses_guc &&
- is_power_of_2(READ_ONCE(prev->engine)->mask | rq->engine->mask)) ||
- (uses_guc && prev->context == rq->context))
+ if ((same_context && uses_guc) || (!uses_guc && pow2))
i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence(&rq->submit,
&prev->submit,
&rq->submitq);
@@ -1604,6 +1628,50 @@ __i915_request_add_to_timeline(struct i915_request *rq)
0);
}
+ return prev;
+}
+
+static struct i915_request *
+__i915_request_add_to_timeline(struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+ struct intel_timeline *timeline = i915_request_timeline(rq);
+ struct i915_request *prev;
+
+ /*
+ * Dependency tracking and request ordering along the timeline
+ * is special cased so that we can eliminate redundant ordering
+ * operations while building the request (we know that the timeline
+ * itself is ordered, and here we guarantee it).
+ *
+ * As we know we will need to emit tracking along the timeline,
+ * we embed the hooks into our request struct -- at the cost of
+ * having to have specialised no-allocation interfaces (which will
+ * be beneficial elsewhere).
+ *
+ * A second benefit to open-coding i915_request_await_request is
+ * that we can apply a slight variant of the rules specialised
+ * for timelines that jump between engines (such as virtual engines).
+ * If we consider the case of virtual engine, we must emit a dma-fence
+ * to prevent scheduling of the second request until the first is
+ * complete (to maximise our greedy late load balancing) and this
+ * precludes optimising to use semaphores serialisation of a single
+ * timeline across engines.
+ *
+ * We do not order parallel submission requests on the timeline as each
+ * parallel submission context has its own timeline and the ordering
+ * rules for parallel requests are that they must be submitted in the
+ * order received from the execbuf IOCTL. So rather than using the
+ * timeline we store a pointer to last request submitted in the
+ * relationship in the gem context and insert a submission fence
+ * between that request and request passed into this function or
+ * alternatively we use completion fence if gem context has a single
+ * timeline and this is the first submission of an execbuf IOCTL.
+ */
+ if (likely(!is_parallel_rq(rq)))
+ prev = __i915_request_ensure_ordering(rq, timeline);
+ else
+ prev = __i915_request_ensure_parallel_ordering(rq, timeline);
+
/*
* Make sure that no request gazumped us - if it was allocated after
* our i915_request_alloc() and called __i915_request_add() before
