Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/ttm: add TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SHMEM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 14.09.21 um 19:31 schrieb Matthew Auld:
On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 10:03, Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 14.09.21 um 10:50 schrieb Matthew Auld:
Add new flag to indicate special shmem based tt, which can directly
handle swapping itself, and should be visible to some shrinker.

As part of this we should skip the ttm_pages_allocated accounting, since
such tt objects should already be reachable, and potentially reclaimable
by some shrinker, if under memory pressure, and so shouldn't directly
count towards the swap "watermark" level.

We also need to stop touching the page->mapping and page->index for such
objects, like in ttm_tt_add_mapping, since shmem already uses these.
Some drivers seems to depend on the tt mapping/index behaviour for their
own purposes, so directly using shmem tt likely won't be usable there
as-is.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c |  4 ++--
   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.c    | 10 +++++-----
   include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h        |  1 +
   3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
index f56be5bc0861..e2131c73dcb6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
@@ -346,8 +346,8 @@ vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved(struct vm_fault *vmf,
                       } else if (unlikely(!page)) {
                               break;
                       }
-                     page->index = drm_vma_node_start(&bo->base.vma_node) +
-                             page_offset;
+                     if (!(bo->ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SHMEM))
+                             page->index = drm_vma_node_start(&bo->base.vma_node) + page_offset;
I still have a rather bad feeling about that.

This should either not be necessary any more in general or the shmemfile
approach doesn't work correctly.

Please send a patch to remove this for everybody instead and we will see
if that really works or not.

                       pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
               }

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.c
index dae52433beeb..cc4815c1f505 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.c
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static void ttm_tt_add_mapping(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct ttm_tt *ttm)
   {
       pgoff_t i;

-     if (ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG)
+     if (ttm->page_flags & (TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG | TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SHMEM))
Maybe you should re-use the TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG for this and/or rename the
flag to better describe what it does.

Something like TTM_PAGE_FLAG_EXTERNAL or similar? The only other use
case for TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG which comes to my mind is controlling if the
pages array is allocated or not.
This seems slightly tricky. We still want ttm_bo_vm_reserve() to
behave normally when seeing shmem_tt, and yet it still needs to return
SIGBUS or so for FLAG_SG, as per the existing behaviour. Throwing in
bo->type == type_sg seems maybe plausible, but at least amdgpu is
manually setting FLAG_SG for userptr objects, so I presume bo->type !=
type_sg here?

Mapping userptr pages through TTM is highly illegal as well since that won't work correctly with the tracking.

But please double check the history of this check, IIRC there was another reason why we checked the flag.

Thanks,
Christian.


Otherwise maybe just s/SHMEM/EXTERNAL and leave FLAG_SG as-is?

Christian.

               return;

       for (i = 0; i < ttm->num_pages; ++i)
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ int ttm_tt_populate(struct ttm_device *bdev,
       if (ttm_tt_is_populated(ttm))
               return 0;

-     if (!(ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG)) {
+     if (!(ttm->page_flags & (TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG | TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SHMEM))) {
               atomic_long_add(ttm->num_pages, &ttm_pages_allocated);
               if (bdev->pool.use_dma32)
                       atomic_long_add(ttm->num_pages,
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ int ttm_tt_populate(struct ttm_device *bdev,
       return 0;

   error:
-     if (!(ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG)) {
+     if (!(ttm->page_flags & (TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG | TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SHMEM))) {
               atomic_long_sub(ttm->num_pages, &ttm_pages_allocated);
               if (bdev->pool.use_dma32)
                       atomic_long_sub(ttm->num_pages,
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static void ttm_tt_clear_mapping(struct ttm_tt *ttm)
       pgoff_t i;
       struct page **page = ttm->pages;

-     if (ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG)
+     if (ttm->page_flags & (TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG | TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SHMEM))
               return;

       for (i = 0; i < ttm->num_pages; ++i) {
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ void ttm_tt_unpopulate(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct ttm_tt *ttm)
       else
               ttm_pool_free(&bdev->pool, ttm);

-     if (!(ttm->page_flags & TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG)) {
+     if (!(ttm->page_flags & (TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG | TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SHMEM))) {
               atomic_long_sub(ttm->num_pages, &ttm_pages_allocated);
               if (bdev->pool.use_dma32)
                       atomic_long_sub(ttm->num_pages,
diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h
index 89b15d673b22..20d550185065 100644
--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h
+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_tt.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct ttm_operation_ctx;
   #define TTM_PAGE_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC      (1 << 6)
   #define TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG              (1 << 8)
   #define TTM_PAGE_FLAG_NO_RETRY            (1 << 9)
+#define TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SHMEM        (1 << 10)

   #define TTM_PAGE_FLAG_PRIV_POPULATED  (1 << 31)





[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux