[PATCH 0/2] i915/uncore: constify the uncore vtables.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [PATCH 0/2] i915/uncore: constify the uncore vtables.
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:45:26 +1000
Cc: jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

static const vtables are more secure than writeable function pointers.

These two patches cleanup the uncore vtable to use static const tables.

Dave.

Follow-Ups:
- ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for i915/uncore: constify the uncore vtables. (rev2)
  - From: Patchwork
- ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for i915/uncore: constify the uncore vtables.
  - From: Patchwork
- [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/uncore: constify the register vtables.
  - From: Dave Airlie
- [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/uncore: split the fw get function into separate vfunc
  - From: Dave Airlie

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915: Add functions to set/get moving fence
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/uncore: split the fw get function into separate vfunc
Previous by thread: [PATCH 0/8] [CI] Enable GuC submission by default on DG1
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/uncore: split the fw get function into separate vfunc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [AMD Graphics] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux