> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Rodrigo > Vivi > Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 8:53 PM > To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Vetter > <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>; David Weinehall <david.weinehall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Tangudu, Tilak <tilak.tangudu@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/runtime_pm: Reduce autosuspend > delay to 1s. > > Let's try to be more aggressive on the power savings, but not as much as 0.1s > that caused us some regression in the past. In IGT we are already using 0 second as auto suspend delay. Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@xxxxxxxxx> > > Also let's have this in a separated patch so that can be bisected and increased > back (or reverted) as needed. > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Tilak Tangudu <tilak.tangudu@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > index 8f052bd4f58c..3244ac85d13c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c > @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_enable(struct intel_runtime_pm > *rpm) > */ > dev_pm_set_driver_flags(kdev, DPM_FLAG_NO_DIRECT_COMPLETE); > > - pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(kdev, 10000); /* 10s */ > + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(kdev, 1000); /* 1s */ > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(kdev); > > /* > -- > 2.31.1
