On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 06:47:52PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > These shouldn't happen, but in the off chance they do, we'll want a > warning rather than panic. looks better indeed: Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.c > index cc83a6532a71..fc09b781f15f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fdi.c > @@ -93,7 +93,8 @@ static int ilk_check_fdi_lanes(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe, > } > return 0; > default: > - BUG(); > + MISSING_CASE(pipe); > + return 0; > } > } > > @@ -217,7 +218,7 @@ static void ivb_update_fdi_bc_bifurcation(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_st > > break; > default: > - BUG(); > + MISSING_CASE(crtc->pipe); > } > } > > -- > 2.20.1 >
