On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 02:29:39PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Thanks for putting the work into this. This conversion has been > requested for a long time. For clarity, should we call the module > i915_kvmgt? If this was a new module that would be my preferance. But the kvmgt module already exists, so I thought it might be a good idea to keep the name. > How far would we be from dynamically modprobing/rmmoding the kvmgt > module in order to eliminate the enable_gvt parameter? Hmm. I suspect it could be done fairly easily, but from what I see it would still require to disable GUC at i915 module load time. If you want I could look into that for an incremental patch, but to unblock the vfio/mdev work I'd like to do that in a separate stage.
