Re: [PATCH v5 15/20] drm/sched: Check locking in drm_sched_job_await_implicit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 3:19 PM Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am 05.08.21 um 12:47 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > You really need to hold the reservation here or all kinds of funny
> > things can happen between grabbing the dependencies and inserting the
> > new fences.
> >
> > Acked-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
>
> The function name in the subject line should be updated, apart from that
> feel free to add my rb to this patch.

Fixed locally and r-b added, I think the later parts of this series
will need to be resent anyway. Thanks for your review.
-Daniel

>
> Christian.
>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 2 ++
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > index 49e507f91ec0..1abb40b07324 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > @@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ int drm_sched_job_add_implicit_dependencies(struct drm_sched_job *job,
> >       struct dma_fence **fences;
> >       unsigned int i, fence_count;
> >
> > +     dma_resv_assert_held(obj->resv);
> > +
> >       if (!write) {
> >               struct dma_fence *fence = dma_resv_get_excl_unlocked(obj->resv);
> >
>


-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux