On Tue, 2021-08-03 at 14:20 +0300, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote:
>
> On 7/31/21 3:10 AM, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > There is no users of it, so no need to keep handling for it.
> >
> > Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 10 +---------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.h | 3 +--
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > index ddfc17e21668a..e4d412d395c34 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > @@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ void intel_fbc_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > if (!HAS_FBC(dev_priv))
> > return;
> >
> > - if (origin == ORIGIN_GTT || origin == ORIGIN_FLIP)
> > + if (origin == ORIGIN_FLIP)
> > return;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&fbc->lock);
> > @@ -1150,14 +1150,6 @@ void intel_fbc_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > if (!HAS_FBC(dev_priv))
> > return;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * GTT tracking does not nuke the entire cfb
> > - * so don't clear busy_bits set for some other
> > - * reason.
> > - */
> > - if (origin == ORIGIN_GTT)
> > - return;
> > -
> > mutex_lock(&fbc->lock);
> >
> > fbc->busy_bits &= ~frontbuffer_bits;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.h
> > index 6d41f53944250..4b977c1e4d52b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.h
> > @@ -33,8 +33,7 @@
> > struct drm_i915_private;
> >
> > enum fb_op_origin {
> > - ORIGIN_GTT,
> > - ORIGIN_CPU,
> > + ORIGIN_CPU = 0,
> > ORIGIN_CS,
> > ORIGIN_FLIP,
> > ORIGIN_DIRTYFB,
> >
> Is this patch absolutely necessary for this series?
Nope, just notice this unused ORIGIN_GTT while debugging.
