On 7/27/2021 9:59 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
On 26.07.2021 21:07, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:Update the get/set min/max freq hooks to work for SLPC case as well. Consolidate helpers for requested/min/max frequency get/set to intel_rps where the proper action can be taken depending on whether SLPC is enabled. v2: Add wrappers for getting rp0/1/n frequencies, update softlimits in set min/max SLPC functions. Also check for boundary conditions before setting them. v3: Address review comments (Michal W) Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h | 11 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 14 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c | 77 ++------- 6 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c index e858eeb2c59d..48d4147165a9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c @@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ static struct intel_uncore *rps_to_uncore(struct intel_rps *rps) return rps_to_gt(rps)->uncore; }+static struct intel_guc_slpc *rps_to_slpc(struct intel_rps *rps)+{ + struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps); + + return >->uc.guc.slpc; +} + static bool rps_uses_slpc(struct intel_rps *rps) { struct intel_gt *gt = rps_to_gt(rps); @@ -1960,6 +1967,164 @@ u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps) return freq; }+u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps)+{ + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); + + return intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RPNSWREQ); +} + +u32 intel_rps_get_req(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pureq)hmm, "rps" looks to be not needed here btw, shouldn't this function be static ?
sure.
+{ + u32 req = pureq >> GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT; + + return req; +} + +u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + u32 freq = intel_rps_get_req(rps, intel_rps_read_punit_req(rps)); + + return intel_gpu_freq(rps, freq); +} + +u32 intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) + return intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(rps); + else + return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->cur_freq); +} + +u32 intel_rps_get_max_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps); + + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) + return slpc->max_freq_softlimit; + else + return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->max_freq_softlimit); +} + +u32 intel_rps_get_rp0_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps); + + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) + return slpc->rp0_freq; + else + return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->rp0_freq); +} + +u32 intel_rps_get_rp1_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps); + + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) + return slpc->rp1_freq; + else + return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->rp1_freq); +} + +u32 intel_rps_get_rpn_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps); + + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) + return slpc->min_freq; + else + return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->min_freq); +} + +int intel_rps_set_max_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val) +{ + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps); + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps); + int ret = 0; + + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) + return intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(slpc, val);few above functions are implemented as nice dispatcher if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) return ... slpc stuff; else return ... gpu stuff; can we have something similar here ? likely just putting below code into helper will do the trick
ok.
+ + mutex_lock(&rps->lock); + + val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val); + if (val < rps->min_freq || + val > rps->max_freq || + val < rps->min_freq_softlimit) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto unlock; + } + + if (val > rps->rp0_freq) + drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "User requested overclocking to %d\n", + intel_gpu_freq(rps, val)); + + rps->max_freq_softlimit = val; + + val = clamp_t(int, rps->cur_freq, + rps->min_freq_softlimit, + rps->max_freq_softlimit); + + /* + * We still need *_set_rps to process the new max_delay and + * update the interrupt limits and PMINTRMSK even though + * frequency request may be unchanged. + */ + intel_rps_set(rps, val); + +unlock: + mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); + + return ret; +} + +u32 intel_rps_get_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps); + + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) + return slpc->min_freq_softlimit; + else + return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->min_freq_softlimit); +} + +int intel_rps_set_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val) +{ + struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps); + int ret = 0; + + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) + return intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, val); + + mutex_lock(&rps->lock); + + val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val); + if (val < rps->min_freq || + val > rps->max_freq || + val > rps->max_freq_softlimit) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto unlock; + } + + rps->min_freq_softlimit = val; + + val = clamp_t(int, rps->cur_freq, + rps->min_freq_softlimit, + rps->max_freq_softlimit); + + /* + * We still need *_set_rps to process the new min_delay and + * update the interrupt limits and PMINTRMSK even though + * frequency request may be unchanged. + */ + intel_rps_set(rps, val); + +unlock: + mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); + + return ret; +} + /* External interface for intel_ips.ko */static struct drm_i915_private __rcu *ips_mchdev;diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h index 1d2cfc98b510..6a66690dfb0f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h @@ -31,6 +31,17 @@ int intel_gpu_freq(struct intel_rps *rps, int val); int intel_freq_opcode(struct intel_rps *rps, int val); u32 intel_rps_get_cagf(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 rpstat1); u32 intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); +u32 intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); +u32 intel_rps_get_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); +int intel_rps_set_min_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val); +u32 intel_rps_get_max_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); +int intel_rps_set_max_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val); +u32 intel_rps_get_rp0_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); +u32 intel_rps_get_rp1_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); +u32 intel_rps_get_rpn_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); +u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps); +u32 intel_rps_get_req(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pureq); +u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);void gen5_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_rps *rps);void gen6_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pm_iir); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c index a98cbf274862..03861eb913d1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c @@ -316,6 +316,11 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val) intel_wakeref_t wakeref; int ret;+ if ((val < slpc->min_freq) ||+ (val > slpc->rp0_freq) || + (val < slpc->min_freq_softlimit)) + return -EINVAL;shouldn't this be part of the earlier patch ?
Sure.
+ with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) { ret = slpc_set_param(slpc, SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MAX_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ, @@ -328,6 +333,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val) } }+ slpc->max_freq_softlimit = val;why in this patch?
moved to previous patch.
+ return ret; }@@ -375,6 +382,11 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val)struct drm_i915_private *i915 = guc_to_gt(guc)->i915; intel_wakeref_t wakeref;+ if ((val < slpc->min_freq) ||+ (val > slpc->rp0_freq) || + (val > slpc->max_freq_softlimit)) + return -EINVAL;same here
ok.
+ with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) { ret = slpc_set_param(slpc, SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ, @@ -387,6 +399,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val) } }+ slpc->min_freq_softlimit = val;+ return ret; }diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.cindex eca92076f31d..0b488d49694c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ frequency_sample(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned int period_ns)if (pmu->enable & config_mask(I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY)) {add_sample_mult(&pmu->sample[__I915_SAMPLE_FREQ_REQ], - intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->cur_freq), + intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(rps), period_ns / 1000); }diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.hindex f3a445f79a36..b4527ca027e3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -9229,6 +9229,8 @@ enum { #define GEN9_FREQUENCY(x) ((x) << 23) #define GEN6_OFFSET(x) ((x) << 19) #define GEN6_AGGRESSIVE_TURBO (0 << 15) +#define GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT 23 + #define GEN6_RC_VIDEO_FREQ _MMIO(0xA00C) #define GEN6_RC_CONTROL _MMIO(0xA090) #define GEN6_RC_CTL_RC6pp_ENABLE (1 << 16) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c index 873bf996ceb5..346646a0b43b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_cur_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct drm_i915_private *i915 = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev); struct intel_rps *rps = &i915->gt.rps;- return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->cur_freq));+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(rps)); }static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)@@ -326,9 +326,10 @@ static ssize_t vlv_rpe_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev); - struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt.rps; + struct intel_gt *gt = &dev_priv->gt;while here, maybe worth to s/dev_priv/i915 same below
ok. Thanks, Vinay.
Michal+ struct intel_rps *rps = >->rps;- return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->max_freq_softlimit));+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_rps_get_max_frequency(rps)); }static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,@@ -336,7 +337,8 @@ static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev, const char *buf, size_t count) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev); - struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt.rps; + struct intel_gt *gt = &dev_priv->gt; + struct intel_rps *rps = >->rps; ssize_t ret; u32 val;@@ -344,35 +346,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,if (ret) return ret;- mutex_lock(&rps->lock);- - val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val); - if (val < rps->min_freq || - val > rps->max_freq || - val < rps->min_freq_softlimit) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto unlock; - } - - if (val > rps->rp0_freq) - DRM_DEBUG("User requested overclocking to %d\n", - intel_gpu_freq(rps, val)); - - rps->max_freq_softlimit = val; - - val = clamp_t(int, rps->cur_freq, - rps->min_freq_softlimit, - rps->max_freq_softlimit); - - /* - * We still need *_set_rps to process the new max_delay and - * update the interrupt limits and PMINTRMSK even though - * frequency request may be unchanged. - */ - intel_rps_set(rps, val); - -unlock: - mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); + ret = intel_rps_set_max_frequency(rps, val);return ret ?: count;} @@ -380,9 +354,10 @@ static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev, static ssize_t gt_min_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev); - struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt.rps; + struct intel_gt *gt = &dev_priv->gt; + struct intel_rps *rps = >->rps;- return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->min_freq_softlimit));+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_rps_get_min_frequency(rps)); }static ssize_t gt_min_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,@@ -398,31 +373,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_min_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev, if (ret) return ret;- mutex_lock(&rps->lock);- - val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val); - if (val < rps->min_freq || - val > rps->max_freq || - val > rps->max_freq_softlimit) { - ret = -EINVAL; - goto unlock; - } - - rps->min_freq_softlimit = val; - - val = clamp_t(int, rps->cur_freq, - rps->min_freq_softlimit, - rps->max_freq_softlimit); - - /* - * We still need *_set_rps to process the new min_delay and - * update the interrupt limits and PMINTRMSK even though - * frequency request may be unchanged. - */ - intel_rps_set(rps, val); - -unlock: - mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); + ret = intel_rps_set_min_frequency(rps, val);return ret ?: count;} @@ -448,11 +399,11 @@ static ssize_t gt_rp_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr u32 val;if (attr == &dev_attr_gt_RP0_freq_mhz)- val = intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->rp0_freq); + val = intel_rps_get_rp0_frequency(rps); else if (attr == &dev_attr_gt_RP1_freq_mhz) - val = intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->rp1_freq); + val = intel_rps_get_rp1_frequency(rps); else if (attr == &dev_attr_gt_RPn_freq_mhz) - val = intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->min_freq); + val = intel_rps_get_rpn_frequency(rps); else BUG();
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
