Am 27.07.21 um 13:09 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
Adding a few more people to this bikeshed.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 10:02 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
@@ -349,6 +367,13 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
void *owner);
void drm_sched_job_arm(struct drm_sched_job *job);
+int drm_sched_job_await_fence(struct drm_sched_job *job,
+ struct dma_fence *fence);
+int drm_sched_job_await_implicit(struct drm_sched_job *job,
+ struct drm_gem_object *obj,
+ bool write);
+
+
I'm still waiting on the paint delivery for these two functions so I
can finish this shed.
Well I wouldn't call that bike shedding, good names are important.
Just imaging we would have called the exclusive-fence write-fence instead.
What speaks against calling them add_dependency() and
_add_implicit_depencencies() ?
Regards,
Christian.
Thanks, Daniel
void drm_sched_entity_modify_sched(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
struct drm_gpu_scheduler **sched_list,
unsigned int num_sched_list);
--
2.32.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
