Re: [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Cache platform frequency limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 7/27/2021 9:00 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:


On 26.07.2021 21:07, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
Cache rp0, rp1 and rpn platform limits into SLPC structure
for range checking while setting min/max frequencies.

Also add "soft" limits which keep track of frequency changes
made from userland. These are initially set to platform min
and max.

v2: Address review comments (Michal W)
v3: Formatting (Michal W)

Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c   | 97 +++++++++++++++++++
  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h | 11 +++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h               |  3 +
  3 files changed, 111 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
index c79dba60b2e6..a98cbf274862 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static int slpc_shared_data_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
  		return err;
  	}
+ slpc->max_freq_softlimit = 0;
+	slpc->min_freq_softlimit = 0;
+
  	return err;
  }
@@ -124,6 +127,18 @@ static int guc_action_slpc_set_param(struct intel_guc *guc, u8 id, u32 value)
  	return ret > 0 ? -EPROTO : ret;
  }
+static int guc_action_slpc_unset_param(struct intel_guc *guc, u8 id)
+{
+	u32 request[] = {
+		INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SLPC_REQUEST,
+		SLPC_EVENT(SLPC_EVENT_PARAMETER_UNSET, 2),
+		id,
+	};
+
+	return intel_guc_send(guc, request, ARRAY_SIZE(request));
+}
+
+
  static bool slpc_is_running(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
  {
  	return (slpc_get_state(slpc) == SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_RUNNING);
@@ -170,6 +185,16 @@ static int slpc_set_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u8 id, u32 value)
  	return guc_action_slpc_set_param(guc, id, value);
  }
+static int slpc_unset_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc,
+				u8 id)
+{
+	struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(id >= SLPC_MAX_PARAM);
+
+	return guc_action_slpc_unset_param(guc, id);
+}
+
  static const char *slpc_global_state_to_string(enum slpc_global_state state)
  {
  	const char *str = NULL;
@@ -406,6 +431,55 @@ void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt)
  			   GEN6_PMINTRMSK, pm_intrmsk_mbz, 0);
  }
+static int intel_guc_slpc_set_softlimits(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)

nit: "intel_" prefix not needed for static function

ok.


+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	/* Softlimits are initially equivalent to platform limits
+	 * unless they have deviated from defaults, in which case,
+	 * we retain the values and set min/max accordingly.
+	 */

fix style for multi-line comment

done.


+	if (!slpc->max_freq_softlimit)
+		slpc->max_freq_softlimit = slpc->rp0_freq;
+	else if (slpc->max_freq_softlimit != slpc->rp0_freq)
+		ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(slpc,
+					slpc->max_freq_softlimit);
+
+	if (!slpc->min_freq_softlimit)
+		slpc->min_freq_softlimit = slpc->min_freq;
+	else if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit != slpc->min_freq)
+		ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc,
+					slpc->min_freq_softlimit);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void intel_guc_slpc_ignore_eff_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, bool ignore)
+{
+	if (ignore) {
+		/* A failure here does not affect the algorithm in a fatal way */

is this comment just for "ignore" case or whole function ? (as you don't
check for errors in "else" case anyway)

moved it above.

+		slpc_set_param(slpc,
+		   SLPC_PARAM_IGNORE_EFFICIENT_FREQUENCY,
+		   ignore);
+		slpc_set_param(slpc,
+		   SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
+		   slpc->min_freq);
+	} else {
+		slpc_unset_param(slpc,
+		   SLPC_PARAM_IGNORE_EFFICIENT_FREQUENCY);
+		slpc_unset_param(slpc,
+		   SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ);
+	}
+}
+
+static void intel_guc_slpc_use_fused_rp0(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
+{
+	/* Force slpc to used platform rp0 */

s/slpc/SLPC
ok.

+	slpc_set_param(slpc,
+	   SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MAX_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
+	   slpc->rp0_freq);

hmm, likely indent is wrong, did you run checkpatch.pl ?

Fixed.

+}
+
  /*
   * intel_guc_slpc_enable() - Start SLPC
   * @slpc: pointer to intel_guc_slpc.
@@ -423,6 +497,7 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
  {
  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
  	struct slpc_shared_data *data;
+	u32 rp_state_cap;
  	int ret;
GEM_BUG_ON(!slpc->vma);
@@ -460,6 +535,28 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
  			slpc_decode_min_freq(slpc),
  			slpc_decode_max_freq(slpc));
+ rp_state_cap = intel_uncore_read(i915->gt.uncore, GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP);

shouldn't this be slpc_to_gt()->uncore ?

yup.

+
+	slpc->rp0_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RP0_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) *
+					GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
+	slpc->rp1_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RP1_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) *
+					GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
+	slpc->min_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RPN_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) *
+					GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;

maybe worth to move "rp" read/parse to small helper function ?

ok, done.

+
+	/* Ignore efficient freq and set min/max to platform min/max */
+	intel_guc_slpc_ignore_eff_freq(slpc, true);
+	intel_guc_slpc_use_fused_rp0(slpc);
+
+	ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_softlimits(slpc);
+	if (ret)
+		drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to set SLPC softlimits (%pe)\n",
+					ERR_PTR(ret));
+
+	drm_info(&i915->drm,
+		 "Platform fused frequency values - min: %u Mhz, max: %u Mhz\n",
+		 slpc->min_freq,
+		 slpc->rp0_freq);
return 0;
  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
index f14f81821a51..16dec703db43 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
@@ -6,11 +6,22 @@
  #ifndef _INTEL_GUC_SLPC_TYPES_H_
  #define _INTEL_GUC_SLPC_TYPES_H_
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
  #define SLPC_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS 5
struct intel_guc_slpc {
  	struct i915_vma *vma;
  	struct slpc_shared_data *vaddr;
+
+	/* platform frequency limits */
+	u32 min_freq;
+	u32 rp0_freq;
+	u32 rp1_freq;
+
+	/* frequency softlimits */
+	u32 min_freq_softlimit;
+	u32 max_freq_softlimit;
all frequencies are from 0Hz to 4GHz ?
or different units/range ?

yes, all of them are in the same MHz units.

Thanks,
Vinay.

Thanks,
Michal

  };
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 5603377e06ca..f3a445f79a36 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -4109,6 +4109,9 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
  #define BXT_GT_PERF_STATUS      _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x7070)
  #define GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS	_MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5994)
  #define GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP	_MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5998)
+#define   RP0_CAP_MASK		REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
+#define   RP1_CAP_MASK		REG_GENMASK(15, 8)
+#define   RPN_CAP_MASK		REG_GENMASK(23, 16)
  #define BXT_RP_STATE_CAP        _MMIO(0x138170)
  #define GEN9_RP_STATE_LIMITS	_MMIO(0x138148)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux