On 16/07/2021 21:17, Matthew Brost wrote:
Requests may take slightly longer with GuC submission, let's increase
the timeouts in live_requests.
Hm "slightly" ends up 5x longer here and one second feels a lot.
Out of curiosity, given this is about a simple submit of a no-op batches
in a tight loop, where does the huge amount of extra latency come from?
Is it single H2G channel shared for all engines, the firmware, or GuC
speed itself?
Regards,
Tvrtko
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
index bd5c96a77ba3..d67710d10615 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_request.c
@@ -1313,7 +1313,7 @@ static int __live_parallel_engine1(void *arg)
i915_request_add(rq);
err = 0;
- if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 5) < 0)
+ if (i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ) < 0)
err = -ETIME;
i915_request_put(rq);
if (err)
@@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ static int __live_parallel_spin(void *arg)
}
igt_spinner_end(&spin);
- if (err == 0 && i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ / 5) < 0)
+ if (err == 0 && i915_request_wait(rq, 0, HZ) < 0)
err = -EIO;
i915_request_put(rq);
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
