On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 01:21:08PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > In c9d9fdbc108a ("drm/i915: Revert "drm/i915/gem: Asynchronous > cmdparser""), the parameters to intel_engine_cmd_parser() were altered > without updating the docs, causing Fi.CI.DOCS to start failing. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c > index 322f4d5955a4f..e0403ce9ce692 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c > @@ -1416,9 +1416,7 @@ static unsigned long *alloc_whitelist(u32 batch_length) > * @batch_offset: byte offset in the batch at which execution starts > * @batch_length: length of the commands in batch_obj > * @shadow: validated copy of the batch buffer in question > - * @jump_whitelist: buffer preallocated with intel_engine_cmd_parser_alloc_jump_whitelist() > - * @shadow_map: mapping to @shadow vma > - * @batch_map: mapping to @batch vma > + * @trampoline: true if we need to trampoline into privileged execution I was wondering if we should also return the original text, but this one here looks better. Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > * > * Parses the specified batch buffer looking for privilege violations as > * described in the overview. > -- > 2.31.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx