Re: [PATCH 08/53] drm/i915/xehp: Extra media engines - Part 2 (interrupts)

[Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/07/2021 22:15, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 01:42:59PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > On 01/07/2021 21:23, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Xe_HP can have a lot of extra media engines. This patch adds the
> > > interrupt handler support for them.
> > >
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h        |  3 +++
> > >  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c 
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c
> > > index c13462274fe8..b2de83be4d97 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c
> > > @@ -184,7 +184,13 @@ void gen11_gt_irq_reset(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > >      intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN11_BCS_RSVD_INTR_MASK,    ~0);
> > >      intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN11_VCS0_VCS1_INTR_MASK,    ~0);
> > >      intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN11_VCS2_VCS3_INTR_MASK,    ~0);
> > > +    if (HAS_ENGINE(gt, VCS4) || HAS_ENGINE(gt, VCS5))
> > > +        intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN12_VCS4_VCS5_INTR_MASK,   ~0);
> > > +    if (HAS_ENGINE(gt, VCS6) || HAS_ENGINE(gt, VCS7))
> > > +        intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN12_VCS6_VCS7_INTR_MASK,   ~0);
> > >      intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN11_VECS0_VECS1_INTR_MASK,    ~0);
> > > +    if (HAS_ENGINE(gt, VECS2) || HAS_ENGINE(gt, VECS3))
> > > +        intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN12_VECS2_VECS3_INTR_MASK, ~0);
> > >      intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN11_GPM_WGBOXPERF_INTR_ENABLE, 0);
> > >      intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN11_GPM_WGBOXPERF_INTR_MASK,  ~0);
> > > @@ -218,8 +224,13 @@ void gen11_gt_irq_postinstall(struct intel_gt *gt)
> > >      intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN11_BCS_RSVD_INTR_MASK, ~smask);
> > >      intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN11_VCS0_VCS1_INTR_MASK, ~dmask);
> > >      intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN11_VCS2_VCS3_INTR_MASK, ~dmask);
> > > +    if (HAS_ENGINE(gt, VCS4) || HAS_ENGINE(gt, VCS5))
> > > +        intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN12_VCS4_VCS5_INTR_MASK, ~dmask);
> > > +    if (HAS_ENGINE(gt, VCS6) || HAS_ENGINE(gt, VCS7))
> > > +        intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN12_VCS6_VCS7_INTR_MASK, ~dmask);
> > >      intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN11_VECS0_VECS1_INTR_MASK, ~dmask);
> >
> > Poor 0-1 sandwiched between 4-7 and 2-3. ;) With hopefully order 
> > restored:
>
> not sure I understand this, order looks correct to me. It handles all
> (possible) VCS engines, and later VECS

Oops my bad, my eyes confused VCS and VECS blocks.

Regards,

Tvrtko

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx