Excerpts from Marc Zyngier's message of June 24, 2021 8:06 pm: > On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:00 +0100, > Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Excerpts from David Stevens's message of June 24, 2021 1:57 pm: >> > From: David Stevens <stevensd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > out_unlock: >> > if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa)) >> > read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock); >> > else >> > write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock); >> > - kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn); >> > + if (pfnpg.page) >> > + put_page(pfnpg.page); >> > return r; >> > } >> >> How about >> >> kvm_release_pfn_page_clean(pfnpg); > > I'm not sure. I always found kvm_release_pfn_clean() ugly, because it > doesn't mark the page 'clean'. I find put_page() more correct. > > Something like 'kvm_put_pfn_page()' would make more sense, but I'm so > bad at naming things that I could just as well call it 'bob()'. That seems like a fine name to me. A little better than bob. Thanks, Nick _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
