Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display: fix level 0 adjustement on display ver >= 12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 02:22:09PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> We should no longer increment level 0 by 1usec when we have 16Gb DIMMs.
> Instead spec says to add 3usec (as opposed to 2) to each valid level
> when punit replies 0 to level 0.
> 
> So set wm_lv_0_adjust_needed to false for DISPLAY_VER() >= 12 and set
> the proper adjustement value when handling WaWmMemoryReadLatency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c |  3 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c   | 13 +++++++------
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
> index 50fdea84ba70..879b0f007be3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
> @@ -484,8 +484,7 @@ static int gen11_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  
>  static int gen12_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  {
> -	/* Always needed for GEN12+ */
> -	i915->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed = true;
> +	i915->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed = false;
>  
>  	return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index ef8d9b2284b3..be2931d54b95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2911,18 +2911,20 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		}
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * WaWmMemoryReadLatency:skl+,glk
> +		 * WaWmMemoryReadLatency
>  		 *
>  		 * punit doesn't take into account the read latency so we need
> -		 * to add 2us to the various latency levels we retrieve from the
> -		 * punit when level 0 response data us 0us.
> +		 * to add proper adjustement to each valid level we retrieve
> +		 * from the punit when level 0 response data is 0us.
>  		 */
>  		if (wm[0] == 0) {
> -			wm[0] += 2;
> +			u8 adjust = DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12 ? 3 : 2;
> +
> +			wm[0] += adjust;
>  			for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
>  				if (wm[level] == 0)
>  					break;
> -				wm[level] += 2;
> +				wm[level] += adjust;
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> @@ -2934,7 +2936,6 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		 */
>  		if (dev_priv->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed)
>  			wm[0] += 1;
> -
>  	} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
>  		u64 sskpd = intel_uncore_read64(uncore, MCH_SSKPD);
>  
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux