On 6/22/21 11:44 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 10:34, Thomas Hellström
<thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
After a TTM move or object init we need to update the i915 gem flags and
caching settings to reflect the new placement. Currently caching settings
are not changed during the lifetime of an object, although that might
change moving forward if we run into performance issues or issues with
WC system page allocations.
Also introduce gpu_binds_iomem() and cpu_maps_iomem() to clean up the
various ways we previously used to detect this.
Finally, initialize the TTM object reserved to be able to update
flags and caching before anyone else gets hold of the object.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v6:
- Rebase on accelerated ttm moves.
---
<snip>
@@ -775,14 +845,13 @@ int __i915_gem_ttm_object_init(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
i915_gem_object_init(obj, &i915_gem_ttm_obj_ops, &lock_class, flags);
i915_gem_object_init_memory_region(obj, mem);
i915_gem_object_make_unshrinkable(obj);
- obj->read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_WC | I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT;
- obj->mem_flags |= I915_BO_FLAG_IOMEM;
- i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(obj, I915_CACHE_NONE);
INIT_RADIX_TREE(&obj->ttm.get_io_page.radix, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
mutex_init(&obj->ttm.get_io_page.lock);
bo_type = (obj->flags & I915_BO_ALLOC_USER) ? ttm_bo_type_device :
ttm_bo_type_kernel;
+ obj->base.vma_node.driver_private = i915_gem_to_ttm(obj);
+
/*
* If this function fails, it will call the destructor, but
* our caller still owns the object. So no freeing in the
@@ -790,14 +859,16 @@ int __i915_gem_ttm_object_init(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
* Similarly, in delayed_destroy, we can't call ttm_bo_put()
* until successful initialization.
*/
- obj->base.vma_node.driver_private = i915_gem_to_ttm(obj);
- ret = ttm_bo_init(&i915->bdev, i915_gem_to_ttm(obj), size,
- bo_type, &i915_sys_placement,
- mem->min_page_size >> PAGE_SHIFT,
- true, NULL, NULL, i915_ttm_bo_destroy);
- if (!ret)
- obj->ttm.created = true;
-
- /* i915 wants -ENXIO when out of memory region space. */
- return i915_ttm_err_to_gem(ret);
+ ret = ttm_bo_init_reserved(&i915->bdev, i915_gem_to_ttm(obj), size,
+ bo_type, &i915_sys_placement, 1,
mem->min_page_size >> PAGE_SHIFT? Although just realised that looks
iffy since it only considers the current region, when it should
consider all future placements. I wonder if it makes sense to make
page_alignment part of ttm_place? Anyway, it doesn't matter for this
series.
Good catch. Yes completely agree it should be part of ttm_place. But
extending ttm_place and audit all drivers to always clear unused parts
of ttm_place is a big task.
But it's also the case that the region manager is allowed to enforce an
alignment, unknown to us here, so we might want to take that approach to
begin with?
/Thomas
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
