It's no problem! We all make mistakes sometimes :), I should have been more
diligent on compile-checking this myself as well
On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 08:20 +0000, Lin, Wayne wrote:
> [Public]
>
> Really sorry for the mistake that I made and any inconvenience it brought.
> Thanks José and Lyude.
>
> Regards,
> Wayne
>
> ________________________________________
> > From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 03:47
> > To: José Roberto de Souza; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Lin, Wayne
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Add missing drm parameters to recently
> > added call to drm_dbg_kms()
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Will go ahead and push this to drm-misc-next-fixes, thanks
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 12:44 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > > Commit 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by
> > > ports in stale topology") added to calls to drm_dbg_kms() but it
> > > missed the first parameter, the drm device breaking the build.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 3769e4c0af5b ("drm/dp_mst: Avoid to mess up payload table by
> > > ports in
> > > stale topology")
> > > Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 7 +++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > index 9ac148efd9e43..ad0795afc21cf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > > @@ -3389,7 +3389,9 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> > > mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
> > >
> > > if (skip) {
> > > - drm_dbg_kms("Virtual channel %d is not
> > > in
> > > current topology\n", i);
> > > + drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev,
> > > + "Virtual channel %d is not
> > > in
> > > current topology\n",
> > > + i);
> > > continue;
> > > }
> > > /* Validated ports don't matter if we're
> > > releasing
> > > @@ -3404,7 +3406,8 @@ int drm_dp_update_payload_part1(struct
> > > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> > > payload->start_slot =
> > > req_payload.start_slot;
> > > continue;
> > > } else {
> > > - drm_dbg_kms("Fail:set
> > > payload to invalid sink");
> > > + drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev,
> > > + "Fail:set
> > > payload to invalid sink");
> > > mutex_unlock(&mgr-
> > > > payload_lock);
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Lyude Paul (she/her)
> > Software Engineer at Red Hat
>
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
