On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 03:29:26PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 10:22, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Purely for CI so we can get some pre-merge results for DG1. This is
> > especially useful for cross driver TTM changes where CI can hopefully
> > catch regressions. This is similar to how we already handle the DG1
> > specific uAPI, which are also hidden behind CONFIG_BROKEN.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Daniel, any objections to landing this?
I think stuffing this into topic/core-for-CI is fine, lets wait a bit more
until mesa and everything is ready with adding the pciids to an official
tree.
(Catching up on mails, apologies and all that).
-Daniel
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > index 83b500bb170c..78742157aaa3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> > @@ -1040,6 +1040,9 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pciidlist[] = {
> > INTEL_RKL_IDS(&rkl_info),
> > INTEL_ADLS_IDS(&adl_s_info),
> > INTEL_ADLP_IDS(&adl_p_info),
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_UNSTABLE_FAKE_LMEM)
> > + INTEL_DG1_IDS(&dg1_info),
> > +#endif
> > {0, 0, 0}
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, pciidlist);
> > --
> > 2.26.3
> >
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
