Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
---
.../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 62 +------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h | 6 ++
3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
index 8a3d4014fd2c..9487d9e0be62 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
@@ -3116,10 +3116,61 @@ static bool can_preempt(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
return engine->class != RENDER_CLASS;
}
+static void kick_execlists(const struct i915_request *rq, int prio)
+{
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine = rq->engine;
+ struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine = engine->sched_engine;
+ const struct i915_request *inflight;
+
+ /*
+ * We only need to kick the tasklet once for the high priority
+ * new context we add into the queue.
+ */
+ if (prio <= sched_engine->queue_priority_hint)
+ return;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ /* Nothing currently active? We're overdue for a submission! */
+ inflight = execlists_active(&engine->execlists);
+ if (!inflight)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ /*
+ * If we are already the currently executing context, don't
+ * bother evaluating if we should preempt ourselves.
+ */
+ if (inflight->context == rq->context)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
+ "bumping queue-priority-hint:%d for rq:%llx:%lld, inflight:%llx:%lld prio %d\n",
+ prio,
+ rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno,
+ inflight->fence.context, inflight->fence.seqno,
+ inflight->sched.attr.priority);
+
+ sched_engine->queue_priority_hint = prio;
+
+ /*
+ * Allow preemption of low -> normal -> high, but we do
+ * not allow low priority tasks to preempt other low priority
+ * tasks under the impression that latency for low priority
+ * tasks does not matter (as much as background throughput),
+ * so kiss.
+ */
+ if (prio >= max(I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL, rq_prio(inflight)))
+ tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
+
+unlock:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
static void execlists_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
engine->submit_request = execlists_submit_request;
engine->sched_engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
+ engine->sched_engine->kick_backend = kick_execlists;
engine->execlists.tasklet.callback = execlists_submission_tasklet;
}
@@ -3702,6 +3753,7 @@ intel_execlists_create_virtual(struct intel_engine_cs **siblings,
ve->base.request_alloc = execlists_request_alloc;
ve->base.sched_engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
+ ve->base.sched_engine->kick_backend = kick_execlists;
ve->base.submit_request = virtual_submit_request;
ve->base.bond_execute = virtual_bond_execute;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
index 4bc6969f6a97..035b88f2e4aa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
@@ -157,65 +157,6 @@ sched_lock_engine(const struct i915_sched_node *node,
return locked;
}
-static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
-{
- return rq->sched.attr.priority;
-}
-
-static inline bool need_preempt(int prio, int active)
-{
- /*
- * Allow preemption of low -> normal -> high, but we do
- * not allow low priority tasks to preempt other low priority
- * tasks under the impression that latency for low priority
- * tasks does not matter (as much as background throughput),
- * so kiss.
- */
- return prio >= max(I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL, active);
-}
-
-static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
- const struct i915_request *rq,
- int prio)
-{
- const struct i915_request *inflight;
-
- /*
- * We only need to kick the tasklet once for the high priority
- * new context we add into the queue.
- */
- if (prio <= engine->sched_engine->queue_priority_hint)
- return;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
-
- /* Nothing currently active? We're overdue for a submission! */
- inflight = execlists_active(&engine->execlists);
- if (!inflight)
- goto unlock;
-
- /*
- * If we are already the currently executing context, don't
- * bother evaluating if we should preempt ourselves.
- */
- if (inflight->context == rq->context)
- goto unlock;
-
- ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
- "bumping queue-priority-hint:%d for rq:%llx:%lld, inflight:%llx:%lld prio %d\n",
- prio,
- rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno,
- inflight->fence.context, inflight->fence.seqno,
- inflight->sched.attr.priority);
-
- engine->sched_engine->queue_priority_hint = prio;
- if (need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(inflight)))
- tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
-
-unlock:
- rcu_read_unlock();
-}
-
static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node,
const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
{
@@ -335,7 +276,8 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node,
}
/* Defer (tasklet) submission until after all of our updates. */
- kick_submission(engine, node_to_request(node), prio);
+ if (engine->sched_engine->kick_backend)
+ engine->sched_engine->kick_backend(node_to_request(node), prio);
}
spin_unlock(&engine->sched_engine->lock);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
index 0c1e417b0164..8bd07d0c27e1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
@@ -153,6 +153,12 @@ struct i915_sched_engine {
*/
bool no_priolist;
+ /**
+ * @kick_backend: kick backend after a request's priority has changed
+ */
+ void (*kick_backend)(const struct i915_request *rq,
+ int prio);
+
/**
* @schedule: adjust priority of request
*
