On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 10:29, Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Since the ww transaction endpoint easily end up far out-of-scope of > the objects on the ww object list, particularly for contending lock > objects, make sure we reference objects on the list so they don't > disappear under us. > > This comes with a performance penalty so it's been debated whether this > is really needed. But I think this is motivated by the fact that locking > is typically difficult to get right, and whatever we can do to make it > simpler for developers moving forward should be done, unless the > performance impact is far too high. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
