On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 11:08 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote: > On 08/06/2021 10:53, Thomas Hellström wrote: > > > > On 6/8/21 10:44 AM, Matthew Auld wrote: > > > Move back to the buddy allocator for managing device local > > > memory, and > > > restore the lost mock selftests. Keep around the range manager > > > related > > > bits, since we likely need this for managing stolen at some > > > point. For > > > stolen we also don't need to reserve anything so no need to > > > support a > > > generic reserve interface. > > > > > > v2(Thomas): > > > - bo->page_alignment is in page units, not bytes > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 26 +-- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c | 55 +----- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.h | 17 -- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c | 100 +++-------- > > > .../drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c | 170 > > > ++++++++++++------ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_region.c | 15 +- > > > 6 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 215 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c > > > index c612275c36c9..5bf1d1945dd6 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c > > > @@ -181,11 +181,7 @@ static bool > > > i915_ttm_eviction_valuable(struct > > > ttm_buffer_object *bo, > > > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = i915_ttm_to_gem(bo); > > > /* Will do for now. Our pinned objects are still on TTM's > > > LRU > > > lists */ > > > - if (!i915_gem_object_evictable(obj)) > > > - return false; > > > - > > > - /* This isn't valid with a buddy allocator */ > > > - return ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(bo, place); > > > + return i915_gem_object_evictable(obj); > > > } > > > static void i915_ttm_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, > > > @@ -328,11 +324,15 @@ i915_ttm_resource_get_st(struct > > > drm_i915_gem_object *obj, > > > struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = i915_gem_to_ttm(obj); > > > struct ttm_resource_manager *man = > > > ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, res->mem_type); > > > + struct intel_memory_region *mr = obj->mm.region; > > > if (man->use_tt) > > > return i915_ttm_tt_get_st(bo->ttm); > > > - return intel_region_ttm_node_to_st(obj->mm.region, res- > > > >mm_node); > > > + if (mr->is_range_manager) > > > > Did you look at moving this test into > > intel_region_ttm_node_to_st()) > > I guess I didn't like the _node since that seems to suggest > drm_mm_node > to me. > > What about something like: > i915_ttm_resource_to_st(res, mr) > intel_region_ttm_resource_to_st(mr, res) intel_region_ttm_resource_to_st() would be nice I think. I think it would be nice if the region ttm code could hide the manager selection. /Thomas _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
