On 6/7/2021 11:03 AM, Matthew Brost wrote:
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Format of the CTB messages has changed:
- support for multiple formats
- message fence is now part of the header
- reuse of unified HXG message formats
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@xxxxxxxxx>
---
.../gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h | 56 +++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 194 +++++++-----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
index 127b256a662c..92660726c094 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
@@ -60,6 +60,62 @@ struct guc_ct_buffer_desc {
} __packed;
static_assert(sizeof(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc) == 64);
+/**
+ * DOC: CTB Message
+ *
+ * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ * | | Bits | Description |
+ * +===+=======+==============================================================+
+ * | 0 | 31:16 | **FENCE** - message identifier |
+ * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ * | | 15:12 | **FORMAT** - format of the CTB message |
+ * | | | - _`GUC_CTB_FORMAT_HXG` = 0 - see `CTB HXG Message`_ |
+ * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ * | | 11:8 | **RESERVED** |
+ * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ * | | 7:0 | **NUM_DWORDS** - length of the CTB message (w/o header) |
+ * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ * | 1 | 31:0 | optional (depends on FORMAT) |
+ * +---+-------+ |
+ * |...| | |
+ * +---+-------+ |
+ * | n | 31:0 | |
+ * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ */
+
+#define GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN 1u
+#define GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN 256u
+#define GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FENCE (0xffff << 16)
+#define GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FORMAT (0xf << 12)
+#define GUC_CTB_FORMAT_HXG 0u
+#define GUC_CTB_MSG_0_RESERVED (0xf << 8)
+#define GUC_CTB_MSG_0_NUM_DWORDS (0xff << 0)
+
+/**
+ * DOC: CTB HXG Message
+ *
+ * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ * | | Bits | Description |
+ * +===+=======+==============================================================+
+ * | 0 | 31:16 | FENCE |
+ * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ * | | 15:12 | FORMAT = GUC_CTB_FORMAT_HXG_ |
+ * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ * | | 11:8 | RESERVED = MBZ |
+ * | +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ * | | 7:0 | NUM_DWORDS = length (in dwords) of the embedded HXG message |
+ * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ * | 1 | 31:0 | +--------------------------------------------------------+ |
+ * +---+-------+ | | |
+ * |...| | | Embedded `HXG Message`_ | |
+ * +---+-------+ | | |
+ * | n | 31:0 | +--------------------------------------------------------+ |
+ * +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ */
+
+#define GUC_CTB_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN (GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN + GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN)
+#define GUC_CTB_HXG_MSG_MAX_LEN GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN
+
/**
* DOC: CTB based communication
*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
index 6a29be779cc9..729f29bc2a57 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
@@ -365,24 +365,6 @@ static void write_barrier(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
}
}
-/**
- * DOC: CTB Host to GuC request
- *
- * Format of the CTB Host to GuC request message is as follows::
- *
- * +------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- * | msg[0] | [1] | [2] | ... | [n-1] |
- * +------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- * | MESSAGE | MESSAGE PAYLOAD |
- * + HEADER +---------+---------+---------+---------+
- * | | 0 | 1 | ... | n |
- * +============+=========+=========+=========+=========+
- * | len >= 1 | FENCE | request specific data |
- * +------+-----+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *
- * ^-----------------len-------------------^
- */
-
static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
const u32 *action,
u32 len /* in dwords */,
@@ -395,6 +377,7 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
u32 size = ctb->size;
u32 used;
u32 header;
+ u32 hxg;
u32 *cmds = ctb->cmds;
unsigned int i;
@@ -425,22 +408,24 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
return -ENOSPC;
Doesn't the free space math up here need updating, since now we have an
extra header dword?
/*
- * Write the message. The format is the following:
- * DW0: header (including action code)
- * DW1: fence
- * DW2+: action data
+ * dw0: CT header (including fence)
+ * dw1: HXG header
maybe better as:
* dw1+: HXG message
*/
- header = (len << GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_SHIFT) |
- GUC_CT_MSG_SEND_STATUS |
- (action[0] << GUC_CT_MSG_ACTION_SHIFT);
+ header = FIELD_PREP(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FORMAT, GUC_CTB_FORMAT_HXG) |
+ FIELD_PREP(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_NUM_DWORDS, len) |
+ FIELD_PREP(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FENCE, fence);
+
+ hxg = FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST) |
Do we have a case where we might want to use a different type? e.g. a
response to a request from GuC?
+ FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_ACTION |
+ GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_DATA0, action[0]);
See macro suggestion for the hxg header in previous patch review.
- CT_DEBUG(ct, "writing %*ph %*ph %*ph\n",
- 4, &header, 4, &fence, 4 * (len - 1), &action[1]);
+ CT_DEBUG(ct, "writing (tail %u) %*ph %*ph %*ph\n",
+ tail, 4, &header, 4, &hxg, 4 * (len - 1), &action[1]);
cmds[tail] = header;
tail = (tail + 1) % size;
- cmds[tail] = fence;
+ cmds[tail] = hxg;
tail = (tail + 1) % size;
for (i = 1; i < len; i++) {
@@ -598,21 +583,6 @@ int intel_guc_ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
return ret;
}
-static inline unsigned int ct_header_get_len(u32 header)
-{
- return (header >> GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_SHIFT) & GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_MASK;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int ct_header_get_action(u32 header)
-{
- return (header >> GUC_CT_MSG_ACTION_SHIFT) & GUC_CT_MSG_ACTION_MASK;
-}
-
-static inline bool ct_header_is_response(u32 header)
-{
- return !!(header & GUC_CT_MSG_IS_RESPONSE);
-}
-
static struct ct_incoming_msg *ct_alloc_msg(u32 num_dwords)
{
struct ct_incoming_msg *msg;
@@ -675,7 +645,7 @@ static int ct_read(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg **msg)
head = (head + 1) % size;
/* message len with header */
- len = ct_header_get_len(header) + 1;
+ len = FIELD_GET(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_NUM_DWORDS, header) + GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN;
if (unlikely(len > (u32)available)) {
CT_ERROR(ct, "Incomplete message %*ph %*ph %*ph\n",
4, &header,
@@ -718,55 +688,24 @@ static int ct_read(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg **msg)
return -EPIPE;
}
-/**
- * DOC: CTB GuC to Host response
- *
- * Format of the CTB GuC to Host response message is as follows::
- *
- * +------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- * | msg[0] | [1] | [2] | [3] | ... | [n-1] |
- * +------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- * | MESSAGE | MESSAGE PAYLOAD |
- * + HEADER +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- * | | 0 | 1 | 2 | ... | n |
- * +============+=========+=========+=========+=========+=========+
- * | len >= 2 | FENCE | STATUS | response specific data |
- * +------+-----+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *
- * ^-----------------------len-----------------------^
- */
-
static int ct_handle_response(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *response)
{
- u32 header = response->msg[0];
- u32 len = ct_header_get_len(header);
- u32 fence;
- u32 status;
- u32 datalen;
+ u32 len = FIELD_GET(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_NUM_DWORDS, response->msg[0]);
+ u32 fence = FIELD_GET(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FENCE, response->msg[0]);
+ const u32 *hxg = &response->msg[GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN];
IMO it'd be better to just save the hxg in the msg field. We can save
the fence as an extra field in the ct_incoming_msg. That way we won't
have to convert from CTB to HXG in multiple places in the code (I count
4 total in this patch).
Daniele
+ const u32 *data = &hxg[GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN];
+ u32 datalen = len - GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN;
struct ct_request *req;
unsigned long flags;
bool found = false;
int err = 0;
- GEM_BUG_ON(!ct_header_is_response(header));
+ GEM_BUG_ON(len < GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, hxg[0]) != GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, hxg[0]) != GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_SUCCESS &&
+ FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, hxg[0]) != GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_FAILURE);
- /* Response payload shall at least include fence and status */
- if (unlikely(len < 2)) {
- CT_ERROR(ct, "Corrupted response (len %u)\n", len);
- return -EPROTO;
- }
-
- fence = response->msg[1];
- status = response->msg[2];
- datalen = len - 2;
-
- /* Format of the status dword follows HXG header */
- if (unlikely(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, status) != GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC)) {
- CT_ERROR(ct, "Corrupted response (status %#x)\n", status);
- return -EPROTO;
- }
-
- CT_DEBUG(ct, "response fence %u status %#x\n", fence, status);
+ CT_DEBUG(ct, "response fence %u status %#x\n", fence, hxg[0]);
spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(req, &ct->requests.pending, link) {
@@ -782,9 +721,9 @@ static int ct_handle_response(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *r
err = -EMSGSIZE;
}
if (datalen)
- memcpy(req->response_buf, response->msg + 3, 4 * datalen);
+ memcpy(req->response_buf, data, 4 * datalen);
req->response_len = datalen;
- WRITE_ONCE(req->status, status);
+ WRITE_ONCE(req->status, hxg[0]);
found = true;
break;
}
@@ -805,14 +744,16 @@ static int ct_handle_response(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *r
static int ct_process_request(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *request)
{
struct intel_guc *guc = ct_to_guc(ct);
- u32 header, action, len;
+ const u32 *hxg;
const u32 *payload;
+ u32 hxg_len, action, len;
int ret;
- header = request->msg[0];
- payload = &request->msg[1];
- action = ct_header_get_action(header);
- len = ct_header_get_len(header);
+ hxg = &request->msg[GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN];
+ hxg_len = request->size - GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN;
+ payload = &hxg[GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN];
+ action = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_EVENT_MSG_0_ACTION, hxg[0]);
+ len = hxg_len - GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN;
CT_DEBUG(ct, "request %x %*ph\n", action, 4 * len, payload);
@@ -874,29 +815,12 @@ static void ct_incoming_request_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &ct->requests.worker);
}
-/**
- * DOC: CTB GuC to Host request
- *
- * Format of the CTB GuC to Host request message is as follows::
- *
- * +------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- * | msg[0] | [1] | [2] | [3] | ... | [n-1] |
- * +------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- * | MESSAGE | MESSAGE PAYLOAD |
- * + HEADER +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- * | | 0 | 1 | 2 | ... | n |
- * +============+=========+=========+=========+=========+=========+
- * | len | request specific data |
- * +------+-----+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *
- * ^-----------------------len-----------------------^
- */
-
-static int ct_handle_request(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *request)
+static int ct_handle_event(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *request)
{
+ const u32 *hxg = &request->msg[GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN];
unsigned long flags;
- GEM_BUG_ON(ct_header_is_response(request->msg[0]));
+ GEM_BUG_ON(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, hxg[0]) != GUC_HXG_TYPE_EVENT);
spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
list_add_tail(&request->link, &ct->requests.incoming);
@@ -906,15 +830,53 @@ static int ct_handle_request(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *re
return 0;
}
-static void ct_handle_msg(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *msg)
+static int ct_handle_hxg(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *msg)
{
- u32 header = msg->msg[0];
+ u32 origin, type;
+ u32 *hxg;
int err;
- if (ct_header_is_response(header))
+ if (unlikely(msg->size < GUC_CTB_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN))
+ return -EBADMSG;
+
+ hxg = &msg->msg[GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN];
+
+ origin = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, hxg[0]);
+ if (unlikely(origin != GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC)) {
+ err = -EPROTO;
+ goto failed;
+ }
+
+ type = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, hxg[0]);
+ switch (type) {
+ case GUC_HXG_TYPE_EVENT:
+ err = ct_handle_event(ct, msg);
+ break;
+ case GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_SUCCESS:
+ case GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_FAILURE:
err = ct_handle_response(ct, msg);
+ break;
+ default:
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+ if (unlikely(err)) {
+failed:
+ CT_ERROR(ct, "Failed to handle HXG message (%pe) %*ph\n",
+ ERR_PTR(err), 4 * GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN, hxg);
+ }
+ return err;
+}
+
+static void ct_handle_msg(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *msg)
+{
+ u32 format = FIELD_GET(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FORMAT, msg->msg[0]);
+ int err;
+
+ if (format == GUC_CTB_FORMAT_HXG)
+ err = ct_handle_hxg(ct, msg);
else
- err = ct_handle_request(ct, msg);
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (unlikely(err)) {
CT_ERROR(ct, "Failed to process CT message (%pe) %*ph\n",
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
index 905202caaad3..1ae2dde6db93 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct intel_guc_ct {
struct tasklet_struct receive_tasklet;
struct {
- u32 last_fence; /* last fence used to send request */
+ u16 last_fence; /* last fence used to send request */
spinlock_t lock; /* protects pending requests list */
struct list_head pending; /* requests waiting for response */
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
