On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 01:31:42PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:09 PM Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Rather than touching schedule state in the generic PM code, reset the
> > priolist allocation when empty in the submission code. Add a wrapper
> > function to do this and update the backends to call it in the correct
> > place.
>
> Seems reasonable, I think. I'm by no means an expert but
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> anyway. My one suggestion would be to tweak the commit message to
> talk about the functional change rather than the helper. Something
> like
>
> drm/i915: Reset sched_engine.no_priolist immediately after dequeue
>
> Typically patches which say "add a helper function" don't come with a
> non-trivial functional change.
>
Agree.
Thanks - Matt
> --Jason
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c | 2 --
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h | 7 +++++++
> > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> > index b6a00dd72808..1f07ac4e0672 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c
> > @@ -280,8 +280,6 @@ static int __engine_park(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
> > if (engine->park)
> > engine->park(engine);
> >
> > - engine->sched_engine->no_priolist = false;
> > -
> > /* While gt calls i915_vma_parked(), we have to break the lock cycle */
> > intel_gt_pm_put_async(engine->gt);
> > return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> > index 2326a73af6d3..609753b5401a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> > @@ -1553,6 +1553,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > * interrupt for secondary ports).
> > */
> > sched_engine->queue_priority_hint = queue_prio(sched_engine);
> > + i915_sched_engine_reset_on_empty(sched_engine);
> > spin_unlock(&engine->active.lock);
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > index 5d00f2e3c1de..f4a6fbfaf82e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > @@ -263,6 +263,8 @@ static void guc_submission_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> >
> > __guc_dequeue(engine);
> >
> > + i915_sched_engine_reset_on_empty(engine->sched_engine);
> > +
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->active.lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
> > index 5bec7b3b8456..713c38c99de9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h
> > @@ -72,6 +72,13 @@ i915_sched_engine_is_empty(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine)
> > return RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&sched_engine->queue.rb_root);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void
> > +i915_sched_engine_reset_on_empty(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine)
> > +{
> > + if (i915_sched_engine_is_empty(sched_engine))
> > + sched_engine->no_priolist = false;
> > +}
> > +
> > void i915_request_show_with_schedule(struct drm_printer *m,
> > const struct i915_request *rq,
> > const char *prefix,
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
