On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:19 AM Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 20:04, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:35:49AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 03:05, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:31:39AM +0200, Zbigniew Kempczyński wrote: > > > > > We have established previously we stop using relocations starting > > > > > from gen12 platforms with Tigerlake as an exception. Unfortunately > > > > > we need extend transition period and support relocations for two > > > > > other igfx platforms - Rocketlake and Alderlake. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński <zbigniew.kempczynski@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > So the annoying thing here is that now media-driver is fixed: > > > > > > > > https://github.com/intel/media-driver/commit/144020c37770083974bedf59902b70b8f444c799 > > > > > > > > Which means igt is really the only thing left. > > > > > > > > Dave, is this still ok for an acked exception, or is this now leaning > > > > towards "just fix igt"? > > > > > > Oh that isn't great is it, I had thought it was the media-driver, > > > keeping a big uAPI like this open just for the test code seems a bit > > > silly. I get the tests are testing more than just relocs, but it's a > > > pretty big interface to leave lying around if we can avoid it. > > > > So since we need to do the work anyway for DG1+ what about some interim > > hack? Currently ADL still has the require_force_probe flag set. We could > > re-enable relocations just for ADL, only while this flag is set. This > > gives us a bunch of wiggle room, unblocks everything else (CI is a bit on > > fire right now due to this and practially unuseable on ADL gem areay) and > > we'll still make sure that when ADL is all done we wont expose relocations > > just for igt. > > > > Thoughts? > > I can handle that as a compromise, though I'd not want to block ADL > getting out of alpha over some IGT that needs porting. Uh given that EHL/JSL are still in require_force_probe = true mode because of a random igt (and shipping since a while) ... I guess worst case if it's not sorted in a few months latest we can undo that again. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
