Am 21.05.21 um 14:26 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
On 20/05/2021 18:47, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 6:31 PM Christian König
<christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah, having the timestamp is a good idea as well.
drm-driver: i915
I think we should rather add something like printing
file_operations->owner->name to the common fdinfo code.
This way we would have something common for all drivers in the
system. I'm just not sure if that also works if they are compiled
into the kernel.
Yeah common code could print driver name, busid and all that stuff. I
think the common code should also provide some helpers for the key:
value pair formatting (and maybe check for all lower-case and stuff
like that) because if we don't then this is going to be a complete
mess that's not parseable.
I see we could have a few options here, non exhaustive list
(especially omitting some sub-options):
1)
DRM core implements fdinfo, which emits the common parts, calling into
the driver to do the rest.
2)
DRM adds helpers for driver to emit common parts of fdinfo.
3)
DRM core establishes a "spec" defining the common fields, the optional
ones, and formats.
I was trending towards 3) because it is most lightweight and feeling
is there isn't that much value in extracting a tiny bit of commonality
in code. Proof in the pudding is how short the fdinfo vfunc is in this
patch.
I would say that we should add printing the module name to the common
fdinfo function for the whole kernel.
And for the DRM specific stuff either 2 or 3 is the way to go I think.
Number 1 sounds to much like mid-layering to me.
Regards,
Christian.
And value should be real semantic stuff, not "here's a string". So
accumulated time as a struct ktime as the example.
Ideally yes, but I have a feeling the ways how amdgpu and i915 track
things are so different so first lets learn more about that.
Am 20.05.21 um 18:26 schrieb Nieto, David M:
[AMD Official Use Only]
i would like to add a unit marker for the stats that we monitor in
the fd, as we discussed currently we are displaying the usage
percentage, because we wanted to to provide single query
percentages, but this may evolve with time.
May I suggest to add two new fields
drm-stat-interval: <64 bit> ns
drm-stat-timestamp: <64 bit> ns
If interval is set, engine utilization is calculated by doing <perc
render> = 100*<drm_engine_render>/<drm_stat_interval>
if interval is not set, two reads are needed : <perc render> =
100*<drm_engine_render1 - drm_engine_render0> / <drm-stat-timestamp1
- drm-stat-timestamp0>
I would like to understand how admgpu tracks GPU time since I am not
getting these fields yet.
1)
You suggest to have a timestamp because of different clock domains?
2)
With the interval option - you actually have a restarting counter? Do
you keep that in the driver or get it from hw itself?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
