On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 04:03:13PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > On 2021.05.18 18:28:53 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:17:05PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > There is no need to keep the dentry around for the debugfs kvmgt cache > > > file, as we can just look it up when we want to remove it later on. > > > Simplify the structure by removing the dentry and relying on debugfs > > > to find the dentry to remove when we want to. > > > > > > By doing this change, we remove the last in-kernel user that was storing > > > the result of debugfs_create_long(), so that api can be cleaned up. > > > > > > Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: intel-gvt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 11 +++++------ > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > Note, I can take this through my debugfs tree if wanted, that way I can > > clean up the debugfs_create_long() api at the same time. Otherwise it's > > fine, I can wait until next -rc1 for that to happen. > > > > It's fine with me to go through debugfs tree. Just double check that recent > kvmgt change would not cause conflict with this as well. How can I check that? I'll be glad to take this through my tree, we can handle the merge issues later for 5.14-rc1 :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
