On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 1:30 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 5/5/21 12:02 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > But we do really need to document the behavior better here > in the kdoc for fwnode_get_next_child_node() and > device_get_next_child_node(). Totally agree! > of_get_next_child has this bit, which applies to those too: > > * Returns a node pointer with refcount incremented, use of_node_put() on > * it when done. Returns NULL when prev is the last child. Decrements the > * refcount of prev. > > I'll prepare a patch to add this to the kdoc for fwnode_get_next_child_node() > and device_get_next_child_node() once I'm done with readying v3 of this series. Thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
