Hi Andy,
> > +/* NOTE: The connector order must be final before this is called. */
> > +void intel_acpi_assign_connector_fwnodes(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
> > + struct drm_device *drm_dev = &i915->drm;
> > + struct device *kdev = &drm_dev->pdev->dev;
> > + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = NULL;
> > + struct drm_connector *connector;
> > + struct acpi_device *adev;
> > +
> > + drm_connector_list_iter_begin(drm_dev, &conn_iter);
> > + drm_for_each_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
> > + /* Always getting the next, even when the last was not
> > used. */
> > + fwnode = device_get_next_child_node(kdev, fwnode);
> > + if (!fwnode)
> > + break;
>
> Who is dropping reference counting on fwnode ?
>
> I’m in the middle of a pile of fixes for fwnode refcounting when
> for_each_child or get_next_child is used. So, please double check you drop
> a reference.
Sorry Andy. This patch is from time before the software nodes
implementation of the get_next_child callback handled the ref counting
properly.
Br,
--
heikki
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
