On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 02:05:53PM +0200, Werner Sembach wrote: > When encoder validation of a display mode fails, retry with less bandwidth > heavy YCbCr420 color mode, if available. This enables some HDMI 1.4 setups > to support 4k60Hz output, which previously failed silently. > > AMDGPU had nearly the exact same issue. This problem description is > therefore copied from my commit message of the AMDGPU patch. > > On some setups, while the monitor and the gpu support display modes with > pixel clocks of up to 600MHz, the link encoder might not. This prevents > YCbCr444 and RGB encoding for 4k60Hz, but YCbCr420 encoding might still be > possible. However, which color mode is used is decided before the link > encoder capabilities are checked. This patch fixes the problem by retrying > to find a display mode with YCbCr420 enforced and using it, if it is > valid. > > I'm not entierly sure if the second > "if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv) && !HAS_DDI(dev_priv))" check in > intel_hdmi_compute_config(...) after forcing ycbcr420 is necessary. I > included it to better be safe then sorry. > > Signed-off-by: Werner Sembach <wse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Rebased from 5.12 to drm-tip and resend to resolve merge conflict. > > >From 876c1c8d970ff2a411ee8d08651bd4edbe9ecb3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Werner Sembach <wse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:59:30 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Retry using YCbCr420 encoding if clock setup for RGB fails > > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c > index 46de56af33db..c9b5a7d7f9c6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c > @@ -1861,6 +1861,30 @@ static int intel_hdmi_port_clock(int clock, int bpc) > return clock * bpc / 8; > } > > +static enum drm_mode_status > +intel_hdmi_check_bpc(struct intel_hdmi *hdmi, int clock, bool has_hdmi_sink, struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) Don't pass dev_priv. It can be extracted from the intel_hdmi. The name of the function isn't really sitting super well with me. I guess I'd just call it something like intel_hdmi_mode_clock_valid(). We should also split this big patch up into smaller parts. Just this mechanical extraction of this function without any functional changes could be a nice first patch in the series. > +{ > + enum drm_mode_status status; > + > + /* check if we can do 8bpc */ > + status = hdmi_port_clock_valid(hdmi, intel_hdmi_port_clock(clock, 8), > + true, has_hdmi_sink); > + > + if (has_hdmi_sink) { > + /* if we can't do 8bpc we may still be able to do 12bpc */ > + if (status != MODE_OK && !HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) > + status = hdmi_port_clock_valid(hdmi, intel_hdmi_port_clock(clock, 12), > + true, has_hdmi_sink); > + > + /* if we can't do 8,12bpc we may still be able to do 10bpc */ > + if (status != MODE_OK && DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11) > + status = hdmi_port_clock_valid(hdmi, intel_hdmi_port_clock(clock, 10), > + true, has_hdmi_sink); > + } > + > + return status; > +} > + > static enum drm_mode_status > intel_hdmi_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector, > struct drm_display_mode *mode) > @@ -1891,23 +1915,18 @@ intel_hdmi_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector, > if (drm_mode_is_420_only(&connector->display_info, mode)) > clock /= 2; > > - /* check if we can do 8bpc */ > - status = hdmi_port_clock_valid(hdmi, intel_hdmi_port_clock(clock, 8), > - true, has_hdmi_sink); > + status = intel_hdmi_check_bpc(hdmi, clock, has_hdmi_sink, dev_priv); > > - if (has_hdmi_sink) { > - /* if we can't do 8bpc we may still be able to do 12bpc */ > - if (status != MODE_OK && !HAS_GMCH(dev_priv)) > - status = hdmi_port_clock_valid(hdmi, intel_hdmi_port_clock(clock, 12), > - true, has_hdmi_sink); > + if (status != MODE_OK) { > + if (drm_mode_is_420_also(&connector->display_info, mode)) { We also need a connector->ycbcr_420_allowed check here. > + /* if we can't do full color resolution we may still be able to do reduced color resolution */ > + clock /= 2; > > - /* if we can't do 8,12bpc we may still be able to do 10bpc */ > - if (status != MODE_OK && DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11) > - status = hdmi_port_clock_valid(hdmi, intel_hdmi_port_clock(clock, 10), > - true, has_hdmi_sink); > + status = intel_hdmi_check_bpc(hdmi, clock, has_hdmi_sink, dev_priv); > + } > + if (status != MODE_OK) > + return status; > } > - if (status != MODE_OK) > - return status; > > return intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size(dev_priv, mode, false); > } > @@ -1990,14 +2009,17 @@ static bool hdmi_deep_color_possible(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > static int > intel_hdmi_ycbcr420_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > - const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state) > + const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state, > + const bool force_ycbcr420) > { > struct drm_connector *connector = conn_state->connector; > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(connector->dev); > const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = > &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode; > > - if (!drm_mode_is_420_only(&connector->display_info, adjusted_mode)) > + if (!(drm_mode_is_420_only(&connector->display_info, adjusted_mode) || > + (force_ycbcr420 && > + drm_mode_is_420_also(&connector->display_info, adjusted_mode)))) > return 0; > This function I think we just want to throw out and roll something a bit better. Something like this I believe should work nicely: intel_hdmi_compute_output_format() { if (drm_mode_is_420_only()) crtc_state->output_format = INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_YCBCR420; else crtc_state->output_format = INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB; ret = intel_hdmi_compute_clock(); if (ret) { if (crtc_state->output_format == INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_YCBCR420) return ret; crtc_state->output_format = INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_YCBCR420; ret = intel_hdmi_compute_clock() if (ret) return ret; } return 0; } assuming we make intel_hdmi_compute_clock() check whether 420 output is actually supported. Could roll a small helper for that. Something along these lines perhaps: static bool intel_hdmi_ycbcr_420_supported() { return connector->ycbcr_420_allowed && (drm_mode_is_420_only() || drm_mode_is_420_also()); } The intel_pch_panel_fitting() call should probably just be hoisted into intel_hdmi_compute_config() after we've called the new intel_hdmi_compute_output_format(). I think a three patch series is probably what we want for this: patch 1: extract intel_hdmi_mode_clock_valid() without 420_also handling patch 2: introduce intel_hdmi_compute_output_format() without 420_also handling patch 3: drop in the 420_also handling everywhere That way if there's any regression due to the 420_also stuff at least we won't have to revert the whole thing, and can then more easily work on fixing whatever needs fixing. > if (!connector->ycbcr_420_allowed) { > @@ -2126,7 +2148,7 @@ int intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode; > struct drm_connector *connector = conn_state->connector; > struct drm_scdc *scdc = &connector->display_info.hdmi.scdc; > - int ret; > + int ret, ret_saved; > > if (adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -2141,7 +2163,7 @@ int intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > if (adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK) > pipe_config->pixel_multiplier = 2; > > - ret = intel_hdmi_ycbcr420_config(pipe_config, conn_state); > + ret = intel_hdmi_ycbcr420_config(pipe_config, conn_state, false); > if (ret) > return ret; > > @@ -2155,8 +2177,26 @@ int intel_hdmi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, > intel_hdmi_has_audio(encoder, pipe_config, conn_state); > > ret = intel_hdmi_compute_clock(encoder, pipe_config); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > + if (ret) { > + ret_saved = ret; > + > + ret = intel_hdmi_ycbcr420_config(pipe_config, conn_state, true); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + if (pipe_config->output_format != INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_YCBCR420) > + return ret_saved; > + > + pipe_config->limited_color_range = > + intel_hdmi_limited_color_range(pipe_config, conn_state); > + > + if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv) && !HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) > + pipe_config->has_pch_encoder = true; > + > + ret = intel_hdmi_compute_clock(encoder, pipe_config); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > > if (conn_state->picture_aspect_ratio) > adjusted_mode->picture_aspect_ratio = > -- > 2.25.1 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx