On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:31:49AM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/fbc: Don't nuke manually around flips (rev3) > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89517/ > State : success > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10031_full -> Trybot_7704_full > ==================================================== > > Summary > ------- > > **SUCCESS** > > No regressions found. ... > * igt@kms_draw_crc@draw-method-xrgb8888-render-untiled: > - shard-iclb: [PASS][33] -> [FAIL][34] ([i915#52] / [i915#54]) +1 similar issue > [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10031/shard-iclb4/igt@kms_draw_crc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_7704/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_draw_crc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx We have some seriously overzealous failure filtering going on here. A lot of new failures on iclb with this run that all just got ignored. We need to get this filtering reduced significantly or we'll end up merging regressions. Not sure if it's possibly to clean it up in any gradual way. Might just have to throw out everything related to crc mismatches and start again from scratch. I suspect FIFO underruns are in a similar situation. And in the future really need to start tracking these types of failures more or less by platform. I think currently we have just several of these ancient meta-bugs where everything gets clumped together, and thus no one can ever know what has been fixed and what is still a problem on each platform. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx