On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 04:43, Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Since it's been asked quite a few times on some of the various DP > related patch series I've submitted to use the new DRM printk helpers, > and it technically wasn't really trivial to do this before due to the > lack of a consistent way to find a drm_device for an AUX channel, this > patch series aims to address this. In this series we: > > * (NEW! starting from V3) Make sure drm_dbg_*() and friends can handle > NULL drm device pointers > * Clean-up potentially erroneous usages of drm_dp_aux_init() and > drm_dp_aux_register() so that actual AUX registration doesn't happen > until we have an associated DRM device > * Clean-up any obvious errors in drivers we find along the way > * Add a backpointer to the respective drm_device for an AUX channel in > drm_dp_aux.drm_dev, and hook it up in every driver with an AUX channel > across the tree > * Add a new ratelimited print helper we'll need for converting the DP > helpers over to using the new DRM printk helpers > * Fix any inconsistencies with logging in drm_dp_helper.c so we always > have the aux channel name printed > * Prepare the various DP helpers so they can find the correct drm_device > to use for logging > * And finally, convert all of the DP helpers over to using drm_dbg_*() > and drm_err(). > > Major changes in v4: > * Don't move i2c aux init into drm_dp_aux_init(), since I think I've > found a much better solution to tegra's issues: > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89420/ I've given this a general once over, seems like a good plan and since it's mostly mechanical. for the series: Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> Dave. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
