Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/stolen: pass the allocation flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/04/2021 17:14, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

On 20/04/2021 14:18, Matthew Auld wrote:
From: CQ Tang <cq.tang@xxxxxxxxx>

Stolen memory is always allocated as physically contiguous pages, mark
the object flags as such.

v2: move setting I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS into create_stolen

Signed-off-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
index 4f9fe5aca37e..46f79b240df7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -633,14 +633,21 @@ static const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops i915_gem_object_stolen_ops = {   static int __i915_gem_object_create_stolen(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
                         struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
-                       struct drm_mm_node *stolen)
+                       struct drm_mm_node *stolen,
+                       unsigned int flags)
  {
      static struct lock_class_key lock_class;
      unsigned int cache_level;
      int err;
+    /*
+     * Stolen objects are always physically contiguous since we just
+     * allocate one big block underneath using the drm_mm range allocator.
+     */
+    flags |= I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS;
+
      drm_gem_private_object_init(&mem->i915->drm, &obj->base, stolen->size); -    i915_gem_object_init(obj, &i915_gem_object_stolen_ops, &lock_class, 0); +    i915_gem_object_init(obj, &i915_gem_object_stolen_ops, &lock_class, flags);
      obj->stolen = stolen;
      obj->read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU | I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT;
@@ -682,7 +689,7 @@ static int _i915_gem_object_stolen_init(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
      if (ret)
          goto err_free;
-    ret = __i915_gem_object_create_stolen(mem, obj, stolen);
+    ret = __i915_gem_object_create_stolen(mem, obj, stolen, flags);

Hm odd that previously the flags were ignored in here. I guess no callers were passing any when creating stolen objects. If none are supported should we add a GEM_BUG_ON to check for that?

I think this it's is still reachable for via object_create_region(), but yeah maybe just leave for later, if we do really need it.


Regards,

Tvrtko

      if (ret)
          goto err_remove;
@@ -700,7 +707,7 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
                    resource_size_t size)
  {
      return i915_gem_object_create_region(i915->mm.stolen_region,
-                         size, I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
+                         size, 0);
  }
  static int init_stolen_smem(struct intel_memory_region *mem)
@@ -866,7 +873,7 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
          goto err_stolen;
      }
-    ret = __i915_gem_object_create_stolen(mem, obj, stolen);
+    ret = __i915_gem_object_create_stolen(mem, obj, stolen, 0);
      if (ret)
          goto err_object_free;

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux