On 16/04/2021 15:25, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 14/04/2021 16:33, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 12/04/2021 10:05, Matthew Auld wrote:
From: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>
In the scenario where local memory is available, we have
rely on CPU access via lmem directly instead of aperture.
v2:
gmch is only relevant for much older hw, therefore we can drop the
has_aperture check since it should always be present on such platforms.
(Chris)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris P Wilson <chris.p.wilson@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_lmem.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_lmem.h | 5 +++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
index 2b37959da747..4af40229f5ec 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
@@ -139,14 +139,22 @@ static int intelfb_alloc(struct drm_fb_helper
*helper,
size = mode_cmd.pitches[0] * mode_cmd.height;
size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
- /* If the FB is too big, just don't use it since fbdev is not very
- * important and we should probably use that space with FBC or
other
- * features. */
obj = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
- if (size * 2 < dev_priv->stolen_usable_size)
- obj = i915_gem_object_create_stolen(dev_priv, size);
- if (IS_ERR(obj))
- obj = i915_gem_object_create_shmem(dev_priv, size);
+ if (HAS_LMEM(dev_priv)) {
+ obj = i915_gem_object_create_lmem(dev_priv, size,
+ I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
Has to be contiguous? Question for display experts I guess.
[Comes back later.] Ah for iomap? Put a comment to that effect perhaps?
I don't think it has to be, since we could in theory just use pin_map()
underneath, which can already deal with non-contiguous chunks of lmem,
although that might bring in ww locking. I think for now just add a
comment and mark this as XXX, and potentially revisit as follow up?
Sure.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
