Hi, On 14/04/2021 15:48, Jun Miao wrote:
Don`t simple disable all the HD-irq, should race the region in the intel_breadcrumbs_disarm_irq() only.
What is HD-irq, I am, not familiar with that term?
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:969 #0: ffff89c4c00ca970 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1cf/0x6d0 #1: ffffa433c1f53e60 ((work_completion)(&engine->retire_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1cf 0x6d #2: ffff89c4ccb0a0a8 (kernel_context){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: engine_retire+0x62/0x110 [i915] #3: ffff89c4cf682300 (wakeref.mutex#3){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __intel_wakeref_put_last+0x20/0x60 [i915] #4: ffff89c4ccb08398 (&b->irq_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: intel_breadcrumbs_disarm_irq+0x20/0xd0 [i915] irq event stamp: 2126 hardirqs last enabled at (2125): [<ffffffffbb134739>] cancel_delayed_work+0xa9/0xc0 hardirqs last disabled at (2126): [<ffffffffc0507fe6>] __intel_breadcrumbs_park+0x76/0x80 [i915] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffbb1099ce>] copy_process+0x63e/0x1630 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 CPU: 3 PID: 281 Comm: kworker/3:3 Not tainted 5.10.27-rt34-yocto-preempt-rt #1 Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC7i5DNKE/NUC7i5DNB, BIOS DNKBLi5v.86A.0064.2019.0523.1933 05/23 2019 Workqueue: events engine_retire [i915] Call Trace: show_stack+0x52/0x58 dump_stack+0x7d/0x9f ___might_sleep.cold+0xe3/0xf4 rt_spin_lock+0x3f/0xc0 ? intel_breadcrumbs_disarm_irq+0x20/0xd0 [i915] intel_breadcrumbs_disarm_irq+0x20/0xd0 [i915] signal_irq_work+0x241/0x660 [i915] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20 ? lockdep_hardirqs_off+0x106/0x120 __intel_breadcrumbs_park+0x3f/0x80 [i915] __engine_park+0xbd/0xe0 [i915] ____intel_wakeref_put_last+0x22/0x60 [i915] __intel_wakeref_put_last+0x50/0x60 [i915] intel_context_exit_engine+0x5f/0x70 [i915] i915_request_retire+0x139/0x2d0 [i915] engine_retire+0xb0/0x110 [i915] process_one_work+0x26d/0x6d0 worker_thread+0x53/0x330 kthread+0x1b0/0x1d0 ? process_one_work+0x6d0/0x6d0 ? __kthread_parkme+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fixes: 9d5612ca165a ("drm/i915/gt: Defer enabling the breadcrumb interrupt to after submission") Signed-off-by: Jun Miao <jun.miao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c index 34a645d..0589b1a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c @@ -103,10 +103,12 @@ static void __intel_breadcrumbs_disarm_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)static void intel_breadcrumbs_disarm_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b){ - spin_lock(&b->irq_lock); + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&b->irq_lock, flags); if (b->irq_armed) __intel_breadcrumbs_disarm_irq(b); - spin_unlock(&b->irq_lock); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->irq_lock, flags); }static void add_signaling_context(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b,@@ -337,9 +339,7 @@ void __intel_breadcrumbs_park(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b) /* Kick the work once more to drain the signalers, and disarm the irq */ irq_work_sync(&b->irq_work); while (READ_ONCE(b->irq_armed) && !atomic_read(&b->active)) { - local_irq_disable(); signal_irq_work(&b->irq_work); - local_irq_enable();
Unfortunately there is another lock inside signal_irq_work (rq->lock) which needs to be taken irq safe.
RT patches are in tree or out of the tree these days? Regards, Tvrtko
cond_resched(); } }
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
