Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] drm/i915/pxp: Define PXP component interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:55:03PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> 
> 
> On 29.03.2021 00:56, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
> > This will be used for communication between the i915 driver and the mei
> > one. Defining it in a stand-alone patch to avoid circualr dependedencies
> 
> typos
> 
> > between the patches modifying the 2 drivers.
> > 
> > Split out from an original patch from  Huang, Sean Z
> > 
> > v2: rename the component struct (Rodrigo)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/drm/i915_component.h         |  1 +
> >  include/drm/i915_pxp_tee_interface.h | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 include/drm/i915_pxp_tee_interface.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/drm/i915_component.h b/include/drm/i915_component.h
> > index 55c3b123581b..c1e2a43d2d1e 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/i915_component.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/i915_component.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> >  enum i915_component_type {
> >  	I915_COMPONENT_AUDIO = 1,
> >  	I915_COMPONENT_HDCP,
> > +	I915_COMPONENT_PXP
> >  };
> >  
> >  /* MAX_PORT is the number of port
> > diff --git a/include/drm/i915_pxp_tee_interface.h b/include/drm/i915_pxp_tee_interface.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..09b8389152af
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/drm/i915_pxp_tee_interface.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright © 2020 Intel Corporation
> > + *
> > + * Authors:
> > + * Vitaly Lubart <vitaly.lubart@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> shouldn't be at least on cc: ?

yeap, good idea...
let's start cc'ing now...

> 
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _I915_PXP_TEE_INTERFACE_H_
> > +#define _I915_PXP_TEE_INTERFACE_H_
> > +
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct i915_pxp_component_ops - ops for PXP services.
> > + * @owner: Module providing the ops
> > + * @send: sends data to PXP
> > + * @receive: receives data from PXP
> > + */
> > +struct i915_pxp_component_ops {
> > +	/**
> > +	 * @owner: owner of the module provding the ops
> 
> typo
> 
> > +	 */
> > +	struct module *owner;
> 
> hmm, usually ops structs have only function pointers, why do we need
> owner here ? and are you sure is it a right place if still needed ?

it is indeed not used here and for this series it could be removed.

I haven't considered this earlier because this came from TEE directly,
but for now, let's remove if not used.

> 
> > +
> > +	int (*send)(struct device *dev, const void *message, size_t size);
> > +	int (*recv)(struct device *dev, void *buffer, size_t size);
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct i915_pxp_component - Used for communication between i915 and TEE
> > + * drivers for the PXP services
> > + * @tee_dev: device that provide the PXP service from TEE Bus.
> > + * @pxp_ops: Ops implemented by TEE driver, used by i915 driver.
> > + */
> > +struct i915_pxp_component {
> > +	struct device *tee_dev;
> > +	const struct i915_pxp_component_ops *ops;
> > +
> > +	/* To protect the above members. */
> > +	struct mutex mutex;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#endif /* _I915_TEE_PXP_INTERFACE_H_ */
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux