Hi, On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 05:54 -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 10:38:11AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: ... > > I think it is possible to argue both ways. > > > > 1) > > HAS_RC6 means hardware has RC6 so if we view PMU as very low level > > we can > > say always export it. > > > > If i915 had to turn it off (rc6->supported == false) due firmware or > > GVT-g, > > then we could say reporting zero RC6 is accurate in that sense. Only > > the > > reason "why it is zero" is missing for PMU users. > > > > 2) > > Or if we go with this patch we could say that presence of the PMU > > metric > > means RC6 is active and enabled, while absence means it is either > > not > > supported due platform (or firmware) or how the platform is getting > > used > > (GVT-g). > > > > yeap, these 2 cases described well my mental conflict... > > > So I think patch is a bit better. I don't see it is adding more > > confusion. > > As I said on the other patch I have no strong position on which is > better, > but if you and Eero feel that this works better for the current case, > let's do it... IMHO seeing case 1) i.e. zero RC6 could be slightly better from user point of view than not seeing RC6 at all, because: A) user then knows that GPU is not entering RC6, and B) then the question is why it's not going to RC6 => one can see from sysfs that it has been disabled Whereas in case 2), the question is why there's no RC6 info, and user doesn't know whether GPU is suspended or not (i.e. why GPU power consumption is higher than expected). It would help if i-g-t could show e.g. "RC6 OFF" in that case. - Eero _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
