On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 16:24, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Test to demonstrate a problem with the proposed default fence expiry > semantics where long rendering chain get silently broken. > > If we had fence error propagation (no clear agreement whether to do it or > not) maybe userspace would see if, assuming fence status is looked at, but > overall potential rendering corruption is the story in any case. > > Note that this is not a single long batch but just a long queue of work > which. Could be viewed as heavy system load as well (like virtualisation > or other types of resource sharing). > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
