On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 23:17, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 09:44:52AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > We've discussed a bit how to get the gem/gt team better integrated > > and collaborate more with the wider community and agreed to the > > following: > > > > - all gem/gt patches are reviewed on dri-devel for now. That's > > overkill, but in the past there was definitely too little of that. > > > > - i915-gem folks are encouraged to cross review core patches from > > other teams > > > > - big features (especially uapi changes) need to be discussed in an > > rfc patch that documents the interface and big picture design, > > before we get lost in the details of the code > > > > - Also a rough TODO (can be refined as we go ofc) to get gem/gt back > > on track, like we've e.g. done with DAL/DC to get that in shape. I think we mentioned in the past about having better annotations for dma_fence critical sections, Otherwise I think this is a great list to get us out of the woods and seeing how to move forward again. Dave. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
