On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:02:36PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > [...] > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:17:34AM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > > index fc02eca45e4d..08b348c9e3e1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h > > @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct intel_framebuffer { > > struct drm_framebuffer base; > > struct intel_frontbuffer *frontbuffer; > > struct intel_rotation_info rot_info; > > + struct intel_remapped_info rem_info; > > > > /* for each plane in the normal GTT view */ > > struct { > > @@ -101,6 +102,8 @@ struct intel_framebuffer { > > } normal[4]; > > /* for each plane in the rotated GTT view for no-CCS formats */ > > struct intel_fb_plane_remap_info rotated[2]; > > + /* for each plane in the remapped GTT view. TODO: CCS formats */ > > + struct intel_fb_plane_remap_info remapped[2]; > > We might want to look into restructuring this a it as a followup. > Maybe we can collect all the rotation vs. remapping stuff into > separate sub-structures. Not sure. Do you mean struct intel_fb_plane_remap_info { + struct intel_remapped_plane_info gtt; unsigned int x, y; unsigned int pitch; /* pixels */ }; @@ -93,8 +94,6 @@ struct intel_fb_plane_remap_info { struct intel_framebuffer { struct drm_framebuffer base; struct intel_frontbuffer *frontbuffer; - struct intel_rotation_info rot_info; - struct intel_remapped_info rem_info; /* for each plane in the normal GTT view */ struct { resulting in https://github.com/ideak/linux/commit/0fd28d738f9 ? Looks better to me. > [...] > > +static unsigned int plane_view_dst_stride(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb, int color_plane, > > + int pitch_tiles) > > +{ > > + unsigned int dst_stride; > > + > > + if (!intel_fb_needs_pot_stride_remap(fb)) { > > + dst_stride = pitch_tiles; > > + } else { > > + dst_stride = roundup_pow_of_two(pitch_tiles); > > + drm_WARN_ON(fb->base.dev, dst_stride < pitch_tiles); > > Dunno if that WARN is particularly useful. We're talking in tiles here > so seems extremely unlikely it could overflow. > > So I'd probably just make this as simple as possible, like: > if (needs_pot) > return roundup(x); > else > return x; Ok, maybe I was thinking of u16, but the overflow for that is checked later. I'll also s/int pitch_tiles/unsigned int pitch_tiles/. > > + }; > > + > > + return dst_stride; > > +} > > + > [...] > > @@ -1280,9 +1282,27 @@ rotate_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, unsigned int offset, > > sg_dma_address(sg) = > > i915_gem_object_get_dma_address(obj, src_idx); > > sg_dma_len(sg) = I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE; > > + > > sg = sg_next(sg); > > - src_idx -= stride; > > + src_idx -= src_stride; > > } > > + > > + left = (dst_stride - height) * I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE; > > + > > + if (!left) > > + continue; > > + > > + st->nents++; > > + > > + /* > > + * The DE ignores the PTEs for the padding tiles, the sg entry > > + * here is just a conenience to indicate how many padding PTEs > > + * to insert at this spot. > > + */ > > OK. That certainly makes this nice and simple. This was only confirmed to be the case on ADL_P, but that's the only relevant place in any case. > > + sg_set_page(sg, NULL, left, 0); > > + sg_dma_address(sg) = 0; > > + sg_dma_len(sg) = left; > > + sg = sg_next(sg); > > Do we have enough sg entries for these extras? Ah, yeah we allocate > based on the worst case where each vma page needs its own entry. Yes, and then i915_sg_trim() compacts it. > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > } > > > > return sg; _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx