On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:35:37PM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > ILK is the only platform that we consider "gen5" and SNB is the only > platform we consider "gen6." Add an IS_SANDYBRIDGE() macro and then > replace numeric platform tests for these two generations with direct > platform tests with the following Coccinelle semantic patch: > > @@ expression dev_priv; @@ > - IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5) > + IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv) > > @@ expression dev_priv; @@ > - IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6) > + IS_SANDYBRIDGE(dev_priv) > > @@ expression dev_priv; @@ > - IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, 5, 6) > + IS_SANDYBRIDGE(dev_priv) || IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv) I'd probably make this IS_ILK||IS_SNB. Looks like we tend to use the old->new order in most of the cases this touches. > @@ -7439,7 +7439,7 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_stat > * plane, not only sprite plane. > */ > if (plane->id != PLANE_CURSOR && > - (IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, 5, 6) || > + (IS_SANDYBRIDGE(dev_priv) || IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv) || > IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv)) && > (turn_on || (!needs_scaling(old_plane_state) && > needs_scaling(plane_state)))) This is at least one case where the IS_SNB||IS_ILK order makes things look confusing. Apart from that I like it. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
