Hi, On 2/17/21 5:29 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 17/02/2021 16:11, Sean Young wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 04:04:11PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> On 2/17/21 3:32 PM, Sean Young wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:41:46PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>>>> Hi Hans, >>>>> >>>>> On 17/02/2021 13:24, Hans de Goede wrote: >>>>>> <resend with the linux-media list added to the Cc> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Hans, >>>>>> >>>>>> Fedora has a (opt-in) system to automatically collect backtraces from software >>>>>> crashing on users systems. >>>>>> >>>>>> This includes collecting kernel backtraces (including once triggered by >>>>>> WARN macros) while looking a the top 10 of the most reported backtrace during the >>>>>> last 2 weeks report from ABRT: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/ >>>>>> >>>>>> I noticed the following backtrace: >>>>>> https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/8150/ >>>>>> which has been reported 170000 times by Fedora users who have opted-in during the >>>>>> last 14 days. >>>>>> >>>>>> The issue here is that cec_register_adapter ends up calling request_module() >>>>>> from an async context, triggering this warn in kernel/kmod.c __request_module(): >>>>>> >>>>>> /* >>>>>> * We don't allow synchronous module loading from async. Module >>>>>> * init may invoke async_synchronize_full() which will end up >>>>>> * waiting for this task which already is waiting for the module >>>>>> * loading to complete, leading to a deadlock. >>>>>> */ >>>>>> WARN_ON_ONCE(wait && current_is_async()); >>>>>> >>>>>> The call-path leading to this goes like this: >>>>>> >>>>>> ? kvasprintf+0x6d/0xa0 >>>>>> ? kobject_set_name_vargs+0x6f/0x90 >>>>>> rc_map_get+0x30/0x60 >>>>> >>>>> It's not CEC, it is rc_map_get that calls request_module() for rc-cec.ko. >>>>> >>>>> I've added Sean Young to the CC list. >>>>> >>>>> Sean, is it possible to treat rc-cec as a built-in if MEDIA_CEC_RC is set? >>>>> >>>>> I think this issue is very specific to CEC. I would not expect to see this >>>>> with any other rc keymap. >>>> >>>> So CEC creates an RC device with a keymap (cec keymap, of course) and then >>>> the keymap needs to be loaded. We certainly don't want all keymaps as >>>> builtins, that would be a waste. >>>> >>>> The cec keymap is scanned once to build a map from cec codes to linux >>>> keycodes; making it builtin is not ideal, and makes the build system a >>>> bit messy. >>>> >>>> I don't think we can load the keymap later, user space may start remapping >>>> the keymap from udev. >>>> >>>> Possibly we could create the cec or rc device later but this could be a bit >>>> messy. >>>> >>>> Could CEC specify: >>>> >>>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEDIA_CEC_RC) >>>> MODULE_SOFTDEP("rc-cec") >>>> #endif >>> >>> That would need to be: >>> >>> MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: rc-cec") >>> >>> I see that the drm_kms_helper and i915 drivers both depend on the cec module already, >>> so yes if that module will request for rc-cec to be loaded before it is loaded >>> (and thus before i915 is loaded) then that should work around this. >>> >>> Assuming the user is using a module-loader which honors the softdep... >>> >>> Also this assumes that rc_map_get is smart enough to not call request_module() >>> if the module is already loaded, is that the case ? >> >> Yes, see rc_map_get(). > > I tried this. It works if CONFIG_RC_CORE is set to m, but setting it to > y resulted in the same problem. It looks like MODULE_SOFTDEP only works if rc_main > is a module as well. Yeah that is a known limit of module softdeps, they only work inside modules ... Still, assuming there is no easy other fix, we could still use this somehow. I do see that at least Fedora actually has CONFIG_RC_CORE=y for some reason. I guess we could maybe add the softdep to the CONFIG_RC_MAP module or maybe to the module which contains the code enabled by CONFIG_DRM_DP_CEC ? At least Fedora has all drm stuff as modules and also has CONFIG_RC_MAP=m, I know this is not a real fix but a workaround to get rid of 170,000 backtraces / 14 days being reported by (opted-in) systems running the Fedora generic kernel config would be welcome regardless of it being the "perfect" fix. Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
